1994British Journal of DermatologyRequires access

Value of a second freeze-thaw cycle in cryotherapy of common warts

J. Berth‐Jones, Jane E. Bourke, H. EGLITIS, C Alex Harper, P. J. Kirk, Sue Pavord, Ramona Rajapakse, PJ Weston, Thomas M. Wiggins, P.E. Hutchinson

Open publisher page 80 citations

Abstract

A study of open, randomized, parallel-group design was performed to investigate the impact of a second freeze-thaw cycle on the cure rate, at 3 months, from cryotherapy of common warts on the hands and feet. Cryotherapy was performed at 3-week intervals, and subjects were randomized to receive either one or two freeze-thaw cycles. In addition, all subjects used keratolytic wart paints throughout the study, and plantar warts were pared prior to freezing. Three hundred subjects were recruited. At 3 months, 124 were cured, 83 were not cured, and 93 had defaulted. Among those who did not default the cure rate was 57% from the single freeze technique, and 62% from the double freeze technique, a difference of 5% (P = 0.53, 95% CI-8.1-18.6). Separate analyses for subjects with warts on the hands and on the feet demonstrated no effect of double freezing on hand warts. In contrast, for plantar warts, the cure rate was 41% from single freezing and 65% for double freezing, a difference of 24% (P = 0.04, 95% CI 2.9-44.4). The use of a double freeze-thaw cycle confers little or no advantage over a single freeze in the treatment of hand warts, but may be considerably more effective for plantar warts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study of open, randomized, parallel-group design was performed to investigate the impact of a second freeze-thaw cycle on the cure rate, at 3 months, from cryotherapy of common warts on the hands and feet. Cryotherapy was performed at 3-week intervals, and subjects were randomized to receive either one or two freeze-thaw cycles. In addition, all subjects used keratolytic wart paints throughout the study, and plantar warts were pared prior to freezing. Three hundred subjects were recruited. At 3 months, 124 were cured, 83 were not cured, and 93 had defaulted. Among those who did not default the cure rate was 57% from the single freeze technique, and 62% from the double freeze technique, a difference of 5% (P = 0.53, 95% CI-8.1-18.6). Separate analyses for subjects with warts on the hands and on the feet demonstrated no effect of double freezing on hand warts. In contrast, for plantar warts, the cure rate was 41% from single freezing and 65% for double freezing, a difference of 24% (P = 0.04, 95% CI 2.9-44.4). The use of a double freeze-thaw cycle confers little or no advantage over a single freeze in the treatment of hand warts, but may be considerably more effective for plantar warts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 80 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study of open, randomized, parallel-group design was performed to investigate the impact of a second freeze-thaw cycle on the cure rate, at 3 months, from cryotherapy of common warts on the hands and feet. Cryotherapy was performed at 3-week intervals, and subjects were randomized to receive either one or two freeze-thaw cycles. In addition, all subjects used keratolytic wart paints throughout the study, and plantar warts were pared prior to freezing. Three hundred subjects were recruited. At 3 months, 124 were cured, 83 were not cured, and 93 had defaulted. Among those who did not default the cure rate was 57% from the single freeze technique, and 62% from the double freeze technique, a difference of 5% (P = 0.53, 95% CI-8.1-18.6). Separate analyses for subjects with warts on the hands and on the feet demonstrated no effect of double freezing on hand warts. In contrast, for plantar warts, the cure rate was 41% from single freezing and 65% for double freezing, a difference of 24% (P = 0.04, 95% CI 2.9-44.4). The use of a double freeze-thaw cycle confers little or no advantage over a single freeze in the treatment of hand warts, but may be considerably more effective for plantar warts.

Key concepts: Cryotherapy, Plantar warts, Medicine, Common warts, Surgery, Cryosurgery, Cure rate, Keratolytic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of a second freeze-thaw cycle in cryotherapy of common warts — Research Paper | ScholarLens