2014•Jundishapur Journal of MicrobiologyOpen access

Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections; Is There Difference in Mortality Between Patients?

Zohreh Aminzadeh, Davood Yadegarynia, Alireza Fatemi, Elham Tahmasebian Dehkordi, Saeed Azad Armaki

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New data indicates that vancomycin may be less effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) within a sensitive range. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the vancomycin MIC between MRSA strains and observe the difference in mortality between patients, while the influence of changes in MIC on the efficacy of vancomycin was also examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A routine date-based study was conducted on 41 MRSA isolates in a hospital in Tehran, Iran. The isolates were assessed for MIC by using the E-test method, and results were categorized into three groups: A (MIC < 1.5 μg/mL), B (1.5 ≤ MIC < 2 μg/mL) and C (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL) MRSA. RESULTS: Group A was the most common group, followed by groups C and B. Although there was no statistically significant difference between patients' mortality with the MIC group, the mortality rate of group A was higher than C and B. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) definition for vancomycin susceptibility (MIC < 2 μg/mL), it seems that vancomycin may not be considered as the best antibiotic in order to treat heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and vancomycin sensitive S. aureus (VSSA) infections, and a new breakpoint for vancomycin and alternative antibiotics should be considered.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: New data indicates that vancomycin may be less effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) within a sensitive range. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the vancomycin MIC between MRSA strains and observe the difference in mortality between patients, while the influence of changes in MIC on the efficacy of vancomycin was also examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A routine date-based study was conducted on 41 MRSA isolates in a hospital in Tehran, Iran. The isolates were assessed for MIC by using the E-test method, and results were categorized into three groups: A (MIC < 1.5 μg/mL), B (1.5 ≤ MIC < 2 μg/mL) and C (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL) MRSA. RESULTS: Group A was the most common group, followed by groups C and B. Although there was no statistically significant difference between patients' mortality with the MIC group, the mortality rate of group A was higher than C and B. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) definition for vancomycin susceptibility (MIC < 2 μg/mL), it seems that vancomycin may not be considered as the best antibiotic in order to treat heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and vancomycin sensitive S. aureus (VSSA) infections, and a new breakpoint for vancomycin and alternative antibiotics should be considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: New data indicates that vancomycin may be less effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) within a sensitive range. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the vancomycin MIC between MRSA strains and observe the difference in mortality between patients, while the influence of changes in MIC on the efficacy of vancomycin was also examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A routine date-based study was conducted on 41 MRSA isolates in a hospital in Tehran, Iran. The isolates were assessed for MIC by using the E-test method, and results were categorized into three groups: A (MIC < 1.5 μg/mL), B (1.5 ≤ MIC < 2 μg/mL) and C (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL) MRSA. RESULTS: Group A was the most common group, followed by groups C and B. Although there was no statistically significant difference between patients' mortality with the MIC group, the mortality rate of group A was higher than C and B. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) definition for vancomycin susceptibility (MIC < 2 μg/mL), it seems that vancomycin may not be considered as the best antibiotic in order to treat heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and vancomycin sensitive S. aureus (VSSA) infections, and a new breakpoint for vancomycin and alternative antibiotics should be considered.

Key concepts: Vancomycin, Medicine, Staphylococcus aureus, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Antibiotics, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Microbiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections; Is There Difference in Mortality Between Patients? — Research Paper | ScholarLens