2004•Journal of Surgical OncologyRequires access

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed preoperatively as hepatocellular carcinoma

Masakazu Yamamoto, Shun‐ichi Ariizumi, Takehito Otsubo, Hideo Katsuragawa, Satoshi Katagiri, Masayuki Nakano, Ken Takasaki

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some cases of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on preoperative imaging and clinical findings. We investigated the backgrounds of such cases. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with mass-forming ICC underwent surgery from 1980 to 2002. Twenty-four of these patients received a diagnosis of HCC preoperatively. We compared the group diagnosed as HCC and that diagnosed as ICC. ICC was diagnosed histopathologically in all 67 patients. RESULTS: The specific clinical findings included high rates of associated hepatitis C virus infection, high levels of serum alpha fetoprotein, lower levels of serum CA19-9, small dimension of the tumor, hypervascular staining on angiography or computed tomography, lower rates of lymph node metastasis, and high rates of HCC occurrence in the group diagnosed as HCC. None of the patients underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection and most patients did not undergo lymph node dissection in the group diagnosed as HCC. The rates of mucus secretion and the ductal expression of mucin core protein-1 (MUC1) were significantly different between the subgroups. The cumulative survival rates were significantly better in the group diagnosed as HCC than in the group diagnosed as ICC. CONCLUSION: Patients with ICC given a preoperative diagnosis of HCC had distinct clinical features and could be treated with the same operation as HCC patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Some cases of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on preoperative imaging and clinical findings. We investigated the backgrounds of such cases. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with mass-forming ICC underwent surgery from 1980 to 2002. Twenty-four of these patients received a diagnosis of HCC preoperatively. We compared the group diagnosed as HCC and that diagnosed as ICC. ICC was diagnosed histopathologically in all 67 patients. RESULTS: The specific clinical findings included high rates of associated hepatitis C virus infection, high levels of serum alpha fetoprotein, lower levels of serum CA19-9, small dimension of the tumor, hypervascular staining on angiography or computed tomography, lower rates of lymph node metastasis, and high rates of HCC occurrence in the group diagnosed as HCC. None of the patients underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection and most patients did not undergo lymph node dissection in the group diagnosed as HCC. The rates of mucus secretion and the ductal expression of mucin core protein-1 (MUC1) were significantly different between the subgroups. The cumulative survival rates were significantly better in the group diagnosed as HCC than in the group diagnosed as ICC. CONCLUSION: Patients with ICC given a preoperative diagnosis of HCC had distinct clinical features and could be treated with the same operation as HCC patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Some cases of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on preoperative imaging and clinical findings. We investigated the backgrounds of such cases. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with mass-forming ICC underwent surgery from 1980 to 2002. Twenty-four of these patients received a diagnosis of HCC preoperatively. We compared the group diagnosed as HCC and that diagnosed as ICC. ICC was diagnosed histopathologically in all 67 patients. RESULTS: The specific clinical findings included high rates of associated hepatitis C virus infection, high levels of serum alpha fetoprotein, lower levels of serum CA19-9, small dimension of the tumor, hypervascular staining on angiography or computed tomography, lower rates of lymph node metastasis, and high rates of HCC occurrence in the group diagnosed as HCC. None of the patients underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection and most patients did not undergo lymph node dissection in the group diagnosed as HCC. The rates of mucus secretion and the ductal expression of mucin core protein-1 (MUC1) were significantly different between the subgroups. The cumulative survival rates were significantly better in the group diagnosed as HCC than in the group diagnosed as ICC. CONCLUSION: Patients with ICC given a preoperative diagnosis of HCC had distinct clinical features and could be treated with the same operation as HCC patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Lymph node, Bile duct, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed preoperatively as hepatocellular carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens