2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of Pre-Consolidation Stress Determination Methods

Omar Conte, Stephanie Rust, Louis Ge, Richard W. Stephenson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Pre-consolidation pressure provides valuable information about soil behavior and, specifically, settlement under an induced load. Soil is expected to have less settlement before its pre-consolidation pressure and much more settlement after that point. The pre-consolidation pressure and the compressibility of the soil can be determined from the results of a one dimensional consolidation test. Different methods have been developed to obtain the accurate pre-consolidation pressure from one dimensional consolidation test data. This paper presents and discusses the results of the one-dimensional consolidation test data from an extensive testing program. The test specimens used were obtained from multiple borehole locations and were extracted using Shelby tube samplers. The focus of this paper is the comparison of three pre-consolidation stress determination techniques, which were performed on each specimen of the large sample pool. The methods used were the Casagrande method, strain-energy method, and intersecting tangent method. The implementation of these methods will be evaluated. In addition, the subjectivity of each method will be addressed. The final results of the techniques will then be compared and contrasted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pre-consolidation pressure provides valuable information about soil behavior and, specifically, settlement under an induced load. Soil is expected to have less settlement before its pre-consolidation pressure and much more settlement after that point. The pre-consolidation pressure and the compressibility of the soil can be determined from the results of a one dimensional consolidation test. Different methods have been developed to obtain the accurate pre-consolidation pressure from one dimensional consolidation test data. This paper presents and discusses the results of the one-dimensional consolidation test data from an extensive testing program. The test specimens used were obtained from multiple borehole locations and were extracted using Shelby tube samplers. The focus of this paper is the comparison of three pre-consolidation stress determination techniques, which were performed on each specimen of the large sample pool. The methods used were the Casagrande method, strain-energy method, and intersecting tangent method. The implementation of these methods will be evaluated. In addition, the subjectivity of each method will be addressed. The final results of the techniques will then be compared and contrasted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pre-consolidation pressure provides valuable information about soil behavior and, specifically, settlement under an induced load. Soil is expected to have less settlement before its pre-consolidation pressure and much more settlement after that point. The pre-consolidation pressure and the compressibility of the soil can be determined from the results of a one dimensional consolidation test. Different methods have been developed to obtain the accurate pre-consolidation pressure from one dimensional consolidation test data. This paper presents and discusses the results of the one-dimensional consolidation test data from an extensive testing program. The test specimens used were obtained from multiple borehole locations and were extracted using Shelby tube samplers. The focus of this paper is the comparison of three pre-consolidation stress determination techniques, which were performed on each specimen of the large sample pool. The methods used were the Casagrande method, strain-energy method, and intersecting tangent method. The implementation of these methods will be evaluated. In addition, the subjectivity of each method will be addressed. The final results of the techniques will then be compared and contrasted.

Key concepts: Consolidation (business), Geotechnical engineering, Compressibility, Geology, Computer science, Engineering, Accounting, Aerospace engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Pre-Consolidation Stress Determination Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens