2006Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryRequires access

European clinical evaluation: Use of Intacs for the treatment of keratoconus

Joseph Colin

Open publisher page 146 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Intacs inserts in keratoconic eyes to alter corneal shape and refractive power and stabilize the progression of corneal ectasia. SETTING: Service d'Ophtalmologie, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: In this prospective study, 57 eyes with clear central corneas that were diagnosed with keratoconus and contact lens intolerant were followed for up to 1 year. The primary objectives were to assess the safety of Intacs and the visual outcomes by measuring uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, keratometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and patient satisfaction. The stability of the refraction, keratometry, and visual acuity measurements was also assessed. RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, 78% of patients showed improvement of 2 lines or more in UCVA (P<.001). Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better improved from 53% of patients preoperatively to 74% of patients (P< or =.033). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved to 3.1 +/- 2.5 diopters (D) (P<.001) compared with the preoperative examination. Keratometry decreased a mean of -4.3 +/- 2.8 D from the preoperative readings (P< or =.002). These changes appeared to be stable over time. At 6 months, there were no adverse events, no clinically significant increase in IOP, and no decrease in central corneal thickness. In 7 of 57 eyes (12%), the Intacs were removed due to dissatisfaction with visual symptoms. There were no adverse effects or complications associated with the Intacs removal. CONCLUSIONS: Intacs were safe and effective for treating keratoconus. All patients demonstrated improved objective visual outcomes; functional vision was restored in most patients. Intacs were removed without permanent sequelae.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Intacs inserts in keratoconic eyes to alter corneal shape and refractive power and stabilize the progression of corneal ectasia. SETTING: Service d'Ophtalmologie, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: In this prospective study, 57 eyes with clear central corneas that were diagnosed with keratoconus and contact lens intolerant were followed for up to 1 year. The primary objectives were to assess the safety of Intacs and the visual outcomes by measuring uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, keratometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and patient satisfaction. The stability of the refraction, keratometry, and visual acuity measurements was also assessed. RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, 78% of patients showed improvement of 2 lines or more in UCVA (P<.001). Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better improved from 53% of patients preoperatively to 74% of patients (P< or =.033). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved to 3.1 +/- 2.5 diopters (D) (P<.001) compared with the preoperative examination. Keratometry decreased a mean of -4.3 +/- 2.8 D from the preoperative readings (P< or =.002). These changes appeared to be stable over time. At 6 months, there were no adverse events, no clinically significant increase in IOP, and no decrease in central corneal thickness. In 7 of 57 eyes (12%), the Intacs were removed due to dissatisfaction with visual symptoms. There were no adverse effects or complications associated with the Intacs removal. CONCLUSIONS: Intacs were safe and effective for treating keratoconus. All patients demonstrated improved objective visual outcomes; functional vision was restored in most patients. Intacs were removed without permanent sequelae.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 146 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Intacs inserts in keratoconic eyes to alter corneal shape and refractive power and stabilize the progression of corneal ectasia. SETTING: Service d'Ophtalmologie, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: In this prospective study, 57 eyes with clear central corneas that were diagnosed with keratoconus and contact lens intolerant were followed for up to 1 year. The primary objectives were to assess the safety of Intacs and the visual outcomes by measuring uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, keratometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and patient satisfaction. The stability of the refraction, keratometry, and visual acuity measurements was also assessed. RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, 78% of patients showed improvement of 2 lines or more in UCVA (P<.001). Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better improved from 53% of patients preoperatively to 74% of patients (P< or =.033). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved to 3.1 +/- 2.5 diopters (D) (P<.001) compared with the preoperative examination. Keratometry decreased a mean of -4.3 +/- 2.8 D from the preoperative readings (P< or =.002). These changes appeared to be stable over time. At 6 months, there were no adverse events, no clinically significant increase in IOP, and no decrease in central corneal thickness. In 7 of 57 eyes (12%), the Intacs were removed due to dissatisfaction with visual symptoms. There were no adverse effects or complications associated with the Intacs removal. CONCLUSIONS: Intacs were safe and effective for treating keratoconus. All patients demonstrated improved objective visual outcomes; functional vision was restored in most patients. Intacs were removed without permanent sequelae.

Key concepts: Keratometer, Keratoconus, Medicine, Dioptre, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Corneal topography, Corneal pachymetry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
European clinical evaluation: Use of Intacs for the treatment of keratoconus — Research Paper | ScholarLens