1972The Journal of ProtozoologyRequires access

Membrane Activity in Freshwater Amebae*§

C Chapman-Andresen

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

SYNOPSIS. The constantly changing shape and surface area/volume ratio of Chaos and Amoeba provide sufficient evidence for continuous membrane activity during locomotion, endocytosis, and cell division. Factors influencing membrane intake and renewal are discussed on the basis of data from tracer experiments and from studies on fine structure. The concept of permanent pinocytosis as an essential part of locomotion is discussed, together with the differences between induced and permanent pinocytosis and the factors which might be responsible for the “induction” of permanent pinocytosis. The large saprobiotic ameba, Pelomyxa palustris differs from Chaos and Amoeba in membrane distribution. P. palustris is generally monopseudopodial, and changes in its shape are more limited. The mucous coat, less pronounced in this species, is most prominent at the very active uroid, the site of endocytosis. The membrane renewal cycle in Pelomyxa has not been studied to date.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SYNOPSIS. The constantly changing shape and surface area/volume ratio of Chaos and Amoeba provide sufficient evidence for continuous membrane activity during locomotion, endocytosis, and cell division. Factors influencing membrane intake and renewal are discussed on the basis of data from tracer experiments and from studies on fine structure. The concept of permanent pinocytosis as an essential part of locomotion is discussed, together with the differences between induced and permanent pinocytosis and the factors which might be responsible for the “induction” of permanent pinocytosis. The large saprobiotic ameba, Pelomyxa palustris differs from Chaos and Amoeba in membrane distribution. P. palustris is generally monopseudopodial, and changes in its shape are more limited. The mucous coat, less pronounced in this species, is most prominent at the very active uroid, the site of endocytosis. The membrane renewal cycle in Pelomyxa has not been studied to date.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SYNOPSIS. The constantly changing shape and surface area/volume ratio of Chaos and Amoeba provide sufficient evidence for continuous membrane activity during locomotion, endocytosis, and cell division. Factors influencing membrane intake and renewal are discussed on the basis of data from tracer experiments and from studies on fine structure. The concept of permanent pinocytosis as an essential part of locomotion is discussed, together with the differences between induced and permanent pinocytosis and the factors which might be responsible for the “induction” of permanent pinocytosis. The large saprobiotic ameba, Pelomyxa palustris differs from Chaos and Amoeba in membrane distribution. P. palustris is generally monopseudopodial, and changes in its shape are more limited. The mucous coat, less pronounced in this species, is most prominent at the very active uroid, the site of endocytosis. The membrane renewal cycle in Pelomyxa has not been studied to date.

Key concepts: Pinocytosis, Amoeba (genus), Endocytosis, Membrane, Biology, Cell biology, Biophysics, Cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Membrane Activity in Freshwater Amebae*§ — Research Paper | ScholarLens