1998International Journal of ManpowerRequires access

The “petty pilfering of minutes” or what has happened to the length of the working day in Australia?

Kathryn Heiler

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

The acceleration of decentralised bargaining, the weakening of the award system and the erosion of the regulatory framework protecting hours of work is part of a new managerial offensive aimed at dismantling standardised working time and driving down costs. Under the guise of progressive “flexibility”, hard‐won protective standards and conditions around working time are being eroded and increasingly replaced with individualised arrangements all designed to intensify work. These new arrangements can be described as the “managerialisation” of working time, and are having profound implications for the duration and distribution of working hours, the scheduling of working hours and the pace of work. Significantly, the eight‐hour day seems a quaint phenomenon of the longer workday and in particular, the 12‐hour workday and the impact of decentralised bargaining.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The acceleration of decentralised bargaining, the weakening of the award system and the erosion of the regulatory framework protecting hours of work is part of a new managerial offensive aimed at dismantling standardised working time and driving down costs. Under the guise of progressive “flexibility”, hard‐won protective standards and conditions around working time are being eroded and increasingly replaced with individualised arrangements all designed to intensify work. These new arrangements can be described as the “managerialisation” of working time, and are having profound implications for the duration and distribution of working hours, the scheduling of working hours and the pace of work. Significantly, the eight‐hour day seems a quaint phenomenon of the longer workday and in particular, the 12‐hour workday and the impact of decentralised bargaining.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The acceleration of decentralised bargaining, the weakening of the award system and the erosion of the regulatory framework protecting hours of work is part of a new managerial offensive aimed at dismantling standardised working time and driving down costs. Under the guise of progressive “flexibility”, hard‐won protective standards and conditions around working time are being eroded and increasingly replaced with individualised arrangements all designed to intensify work. These new arrangements can be described as the “managerialisation” of working time, and are having profound implications for the duration and distribution of working hours, the scheduling of working hours and the pace of work. Significantly, the eight‐hour day seems a quaint phenomenon of the longer workday and in particular, the 12‐hour workday and the impact of decentralised bargaining.

Key concepts: Working hours, Working time, Flexibility (engineering), Pace, Work (physics), Labour economics, Economics, Operations management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “petty pilfering of minutes” or what has happened to the length of the working day in Australia? — Research Paper | ScholarLens