1995•Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyRequires access

Behavioral Interaction between Chinook Salmon and Brown Trout Juveniles in a Simulated Stream

G. J. Glova, M. S. Field‐Dodgson

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

The behavioral interaction between underyearling Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and brown trout Salmo trutta, both exotics in an unnatural sympatry in New Zealand, was tested during spring and summer in a simulated stream containing natural food. Both species were highly territorial and actively defended preferred drift-feeding sites and resting areas in the pool. Species dominance differed with season and was influenced by prior residence. In spring, Chinook salmon were larger (because of their earlier emergence) and socially dominant, but they did not dominate when brown trout had prior residence. In summer, interspecific differences in size no longer existed, and brown trout were always socially dominant, although dominance required more time to establish when Chinook salmon were prior residents. Most aggressive attacks of both species were initiated and won by the dominant fish in both spring and summer. Yearling brown trout in the pool in summer did not influence the interaction between underyearlings. Tactics in maintaining territory differed between species, with brown trout using a more energy-conserving strategy (frequent resting in preferred cover areas) than did Chinook salmon (primarily free-swimming). Brown trout could adversely affect juvenile Chinook salmon populations; therefore, this species should not be added to streams with Chinook salmon.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The behavioral interaction between underyearling Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and brown trout Salmo trutta, both exotics in an unnatural sympatry in New Zealand, was tested during spring and summer in a simulated stream containing natural food. Both species were highly territorial and actively defended preferred drift-feeding sites and resting areas in the pool. Species dominance differed with season and was influenced by prior residence. In spring, Chinook salmon were larger (because of their earlier emergence) and socially dominant, but they did not dominate when brown trout had prior residence. In summer, interspecific differences in size no longer existed, and brown trout were always socially dominant, although dominance required more time to establish when Chinook salmon were prior residents. Most aggressive attacks of both species were initiated and won by the dominant fish in both spring and summer. Yearling brown trout in the pool in summer did not influence the interaction between underyearlings. Tactics in maintaining territory differed between species, with brown trout using a more energy-conserving strategy (frequent resting in preferred cover areas) than did Chinook salmon (primarily free-swimming). Brown trout could adversely affect juvenile Chinook salmon populations; therefore, this species should not be added to streams with Chinook salmon.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The behavioral interaction between underyearling Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and brown trout Salmo trutta, both exotics in an unnatural sympatry in New Zealand, was tested during spring and summer in a simulated stream containing natural food. Both species were highly territorial and actively defended preferred drift-feeding sites and resting areas in the pool. Species dominance differed with season and was influenced by prior residence. In spring, Chinook salmon were larger (because of their earlier emergence) and socially dominant, but they did not dominate when brown trout had prior residence. In summer, interspecific differences in size no longer existed, and brown trout were always socially dominant, although dominance required more time to establish when Chinook salmon were prior residents. Most aggressive attacks of both species were initiated and won by the dominant fish in both spring and summer. Yearling brown trout in the pool in summer did not influence the interaction between underyearlings. Tactics in maintaining territory differed between species, with brown trout using a more energy-conserving strategy (frequent resting in preferred cover areas) than did Chinook salmon (primarily free-swimming). Brown trout could adversely affect juvenile Chinook salmon populations; therefore, this species should not be added to streams with Chinook salmon.

Key concepts: Chinook wind, Brown trout, Oncorhynchus, Salmo, Trout, Fishery, Juvenile, Dominance (genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behavioral Interaction between Chinook Salmon and Brown Trout Juveniles in a Simulated Stream — Research Paper | ScholarLens