1993Scandinavian Journal of Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Activity of Erythromycin and Clindamycin in an Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Normal and Granulocytopenic Mice

Jaap J. Hoogeterp, Herman Mattie, Ralph van Furth

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The activity of 2 bacteriostatic antibiotics, erythromycin and clindamycin, against Staphylococcus aureus was studied in vitro and in an experimental infection in granulocytopenic as well as normal mice. In vivo, on the basis of dosage, erythromycin was 2.20 times more potent than clindamycin in normal mice and 1.95 times more potent in irradiated granulocytopenic mice. Tissue concentrations were calculated from the plasma concentrations, taking plasma protein and tissue binding into account. On the basis of the area under the curve for the free tissue concentrations, clindamycin was 1.48 times more potent than erythromycin in normal mice and 1.64 times more potent in irradiated mice, which is somewhat less than expected from the comparison in vitro. It is concluded that the relative antistaphylococcal efficacies of erythromycin and clindamycin in vivo can be predicted from the in-vitro values if the relevant pharmacokinetics are taken into account. Irradiation decreased the efficacy of both antibiotics such that an about 8-fold increase in dose led to an antibacterial effect similar to that in non-irradiated animals. This could imply that these drugs will not be sufficiently effective against staphylococcal infections in granulocytopenic patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The activity of 2 bacteriostatic antibiotics, erythromycin and clindamycin, against Staphylococcus aureus was studied in vitro and in an experimental infection in granulocytopenic as well as normal mice. In vivo, on the basis of dosage, erythromycin was 2.20 times more potent than clindamycin in normal mice and 1.95 times more potent in irradiated granulocytopenic mice. Tissue concentrations were calculated from the plasma concentrations, taking plasma protein and tissue binding into account. On the basis of the area under the curve for the free tissue concentrations, clindamycin was 1.48 times more potent than erythromycin in normal mice and 1.64 times more potent in irradiated mice, which is somewhat less than expected from the comparison in vitro. It is concluded that the relative antistaphylococcal efficacies of erythromycin and clindamycin in vivo can be predicted from the in-vitro values if the relevant pharmacokinetics are taken into account. Irradiation decreased the efficacy of both antibiotics such that an about 8-fold increase in dose led to an antibacterial effect similar to that in non-irradiated animals. This could imply that these drugs will not be sufficiently effective against staphylococcal infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The activity of 2 bacteriostatic antibiotics, erythromycin and clindamycin, against Staphylococcus aureus was studied in vitro and in an experimental infection in granulocytopenic as well as normal mice. In vivo, on the basis of dosage, erythromycin was 2.20 times more potent than clindamycin in normal mice and 1.95 times more potent in irradiated granulocytopenic mice. Tissue concentrations were calculated from the plasma concentrations, taking plasma protein and tissue binding into account. On the basis of the area under the curve for the free tissue concentrations, clindamycin was 1.48 times more potent than erythromycin in normal mice and 1.64 times more potent in irradiated mice, which is somewhat less than expected from the comparison in vitro. It is concluded that the relative antistaphylococcal efficacies of erythromycin and clindamycin in vivo can be predicted from the in-vitro values if the relevant pharmacokinetics are taken into account. Irradiation decreased the efficacy of both antibiotics such that an about 8-fold increase in dose led to an antibacterial effect similar to that in non-irradiated animals. This could imply that these drugs will not be sufficiently effective against staphylococcal infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Key concepts: Erythromycin, Clindamycin, Staphylococcus aureus, In vivo, Antibiotics, Microbiology, In vitro, Pharmacokinetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Activity of Erythromycin and Clindamycin in an Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Normal and Granulocytopenic Mice — Research Paper | ScholarLens