1990International Journal of HyperthermiaRequires access

A comparison of temperatures in canine solid tumours during local and whole-body hyperthermia administered alone and simultaneously

Donald E. Thrall, Mark W. Dewhirst, Rodney L. Page, Thaddeus V. Samulski, Deboroah A. McLeod, James R. Oleson

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Temperature measurements were made in canine solid tumours during whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) alone, local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH. During the plateau phase of WBH alone, mean intratumoral temperature ranged from 41.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C to 41.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C and was statistically lower (P = 0.0028) and more variable than rectal temperature, which ranged from 42.0 +/- 0.02 degrees C to 42.1 +/- 0.03 degrees C. The temperature distribution in solid tumours during WBH is more uniform than during local hyperthermia. The simultaneous administration of whole-body and local hyperthermia in five dogs resulted in increased tumour temperatures in comparison to WBH and in more uniformly increased tumour temperatures in comparison to local hyperthermia alone. Median intratumoral temperatures (+/- 95% confidence intervals) resulting from local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH were 39.9 degrees C (39.7-40.1) and 42.9 degrees C (42.6-43.1), respectively, and were statistically different (P = 0.0012). Local applied power requirements to meet predetermined intratumoral temperature limits were decreased by 50% (P = 0.011) in dogs undergoing combined local/whole-body hyperthermia versus local hyperthermia alone. Dogs tolerated the combination of local and WBH without complication.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Temperature measurements were made in canine solid tumours during whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) alone, local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH. During the plateau phase of WBH alone, mean intratumoral temperature ranged from 41.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C to 41.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C and was statistically lower (P = 0.0028) and more variable than rectal temperature, which ranged from 42.0 +/- 0.02 degrees C to 42.1 +/- 0.03 degrees C. The temperature distribution in solid tumours during WBH is more uniform than during local hyperthermia. The simultaneous administration of whole-body and local hyperthermia in five dogs resulted in increased tumour temperatures in comparison to WBH and in more uniformly increased tumour temperatures in comparison to local hyperthermia alone. Median intratumoral temperatures (+/- 95% confidence intervals) resulting from local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH were 39.9 degrees C (39.7-40.1) and 42.9 degrees C (42.6-43.1), respectively, and were statistically different (P = 0.0012). Local applied power requirements to meet predetermined intratumoral temperature limits were decreased by 50% (P = 0.011) in dogs undergoing combined local/whole-body hyperthermia versus local hyperthermia alone. Dogs tolerated the combination of local and WBH without complication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Temperature measurements were made in canine solid tumours during whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) alone, local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH. During the plateau phase of WBH alone, mean intratumoral temperature ranged from 41.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C to 41.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C and was statistically lower (P = 0.0028) and more variable than rectal temperature, which ranged from 42.0 +/- 0.02 degrees C to 42.1 +/- 0.03 degrees C. The temperature distribution in solid tumours during WBH is more uniform than during local hyperthermia. The simultaneous administration of whole-body and local hyperthermia in five dogs resulted in increased tumour temperatures in comparison to WBH and in more uniformly increased tumour temperatures in comparison to local hyperthermia alone. Median intratumoral temperatures (+/- 95% confidence intervals) resulting from local hyperthermia alone and local hyperthermia given simultaneously with WBH were 39.9 degrees C (39.7-40.1) and 42.9 degrees C (42.6-43.1), respectively, and were statistically different (P = 0.0012). Local applied power requirements to meet predetermined intratumoral temperature limits were decreased by 50% (P = 0.011) in dogs undergoing combined local/whole-body hyperthermia versus local hyperthermia alone. Dogs tolerated the combination of local and WBH without complication.

Key concepts: Hyperthermia, Medicine, Anesthesia, Hyperthermia Treatment, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of temperatures in canine solid tumours during local and whole-body hyperthermia administered alone and simultaneously — Research Paper | ScholarLens