2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Does Social Capital Work in Thai Politics

Wanlapat Suksawas, Peter B. Mayer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The study employed Robert D. Putnam’s concept of social capital to study Thai politics. It had three main objectives: to investigate the capacity of social capital in Thai society to increase people’s political participation in local government, to examine whether social capital improves the institutional performance of local government, and to explore both the impact of people’s political participation in local government on the institutional performance of local governments, and the impact of institutional performance on people’s political participation, in the north of Thailand. There were\tthree\tmain\tfindings\tin\twhich\temerged\tfrom\tthe\tresearch. Firstly, it was found that social capital does not promote people’s participation in local politics. Secondly, it was evident that not all components of social capital can enhance the institutional performance of local government. Networks of civic engagement and generalized trust fail to increase the effective institutional performance of local government. Lastly, it was discovered that political participation by citizens and institutional performance has no positive effect on each other. It can be concluded that Putnam’s concept of social capital shows clear limitations and cannot be employed effectively in the context of Thai politics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study employed Robert D. Putnam’s concept of social capital to study Thai politics. It had three main objectives: to investigate the capacity of social capital in Thai society to increase people’s political participation in local government, to examine whether social capital improves the institutional performance of local government, and to explore both the impact of people’s political participation in local government on the institutional performance of local governments, and the impact of institutional performance on people’s political participation, in the north of Thailand. There were\tthree\tmain\tfindings\tin\twhich\temerged\tfrom\tthe\tresearch. Firstly, it was found that social capital does not promote people’s participation in local politics. Secondly, it was evident that not all components of social capital can enhance the institutional performance of local government. Networks of civic engagement and generalized trust fail to increase the effective institutional performance of local government. Lastly, it was discovered that political participation by citizens and institutional performance has no positive effect on each other. It can be concluded that Putnam’s concept of social capital shows clear limitations and cannot be employed effectively in the context of Thai politics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study employed Robert D. Putnam’s concept of social capital to study Thai politics. It had three main objectives: to investigate the capacity of social capital in Thai society to increase people’s political participation in local government, to examine whether social capital improves the institutional performance of local government, and to explore both the impact of people’s political participation in local government on the institutional performance of local governments, and the impact of institutional performance on people’s political participation, in the north of Thailand. There were\tthree\tmain\tfindings\tin\twhich\temerged\tfrom\tthe\tresearch. Firstly, it was found that social capital does not promote people’s participation in local politics. Secondly, it was evident that not all components of social capital can enhance the institutional performance of local government. Networks of civic engagement and generalized trust fail to increase the effective institutional performance of local government. Lastly, it was discovered that political participation by citizens and institutional performance has no positive effect on each other. It can be concluded that Putnam’s concept of social capital shows clear limitations and cannot be employed effectively in the context of Thai politics.

Key concepts: Social capital, Local government, Politics, Government (linguistics), Political capital, Context (archaeology), Political science, Capital (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does Social Capital Work in Thai Politics — Research Paper | ScholarLens