Minus-power intraocular lenses to correct refractive errors in myopic pseudophakia
James P. Gills, Robert E. Fenzl
Abstract
James P. Gills, Robert E. Fenzl
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a secondary, piggyback, minus-power intraocular lens (IOL) to correct the refractive error in patients with myopic pseudophakia. METHODS: In this prospective noncomparative cohort study, 51 myopic pseudophakic patients received implantation of a minus-power IOL as a secondary procedure to correct residual pseudophakic myopia. RESULTS: The mean residual myopia of -3.05 diopters (D) was reduced to -0.38 D. All eyes were within +/- 1.00 D of the desired refraction. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 72% of eyes, and best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 96%. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by 2 or more lines in 85% of eyes and by 5 or more lines in 65%. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes can now be improved in patients with myopic pseudophakia whose previous options (i.e., lens exchange or refractive surgery) were more traumatic or less predictable.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a secondary, piggyback, minus-power intraocular lens (IOL) to correct the refractive error in patients with myopic pseudophakia. METHODS: In this prospective noncomparative cohort study, 51 myopic pseudophakic patients received implantation of a minus-power IOL as a secondary procedure to correct residual pseudophakic myopia. RESULTS: The mean residual myopia of -3.05 diopters (D) was reduced to -0.38 D. All eyes were within +/- 1.00 D of the desired refraction. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 72% of eyes, and best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 96%. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by 2 or more lines in 85% of eyes and by 5 or more lines in 65%. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes can now be improved in patients with myopic pseudophakia whose previous options (i.e., lens exchange or refractive surgery) were more traumatic or less predictable.
Key concepts: Pseudophakia, Dioptre, Intraocular lens, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Refractive error, Visual acuity, Aphakia