2002•Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Open access

Do Transitive Adjectives Really Exist

Byung Soo Park

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

I argue that the so-called psychological predicates like komapta 'thankful,' mwusepta 'fearful,' silhta `loathsome,' or kulipta 'missing' require a nominative subject and a locative or dative complement, challenging the claim, a conventional wisdom originated from Kuno(1973), that they are two-place "transitive adjectives" requiring a nominative direct object.I also show that those adjectives are subject to having the locative-dative complement extracted, which is ultimately realized as a focused subject or a topic.Thus, in this type of double nominative constructions, the first nominative is a focused subject, and the second nominative forms an embedded clause with the psychological predicate, which functions as the predicate of the whole sentence.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I argue that the so-called psychological predicates like komapta 'thankful,' mwusepta 'fearful,' silhta `loathsome,' or kulipta 'missing' require a nominative subject and a locative or dative complement, challenging the claim, a conventional wisdom originated from Kuno(1973), that they are two-place "transitive adjectives" requiring a nominative direct object.I also show that those adjectives are subject to having the locative-dative complement extracted, which is ultimately realized as a focused subject or a topic.Thus, in this type of double nominative constructions, the first nominative is a focused subject, and the second nominative forms an embedded clause with the psychological predicate, which functions as the predicate of the whole sentence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I argue that the so-called psychological predicates like komapta 'thankful,' mwusepta 'fearful,' silhta `loathsome,' or kulipta 'missing' require a nominative subject and a locative or dative complement, challenging the claim, a conventional wisdom originated from Kuno(1973), that they are two-place "transitive adjectives" requiring a nominative direct object.I also show that those adjectives are subject to having the locative-dative complement extracted, which is ultimately realized as a focused subject or a topic.Thus, in this type of double nominative constructions, the first nominative is a focused subject, and the second nominative forms an embedded clause with the psychological predicate, which functions as the predicate of the whole sentence.

Key concepts: Nominative case, Locative case, Transitive relation, Dative case, Linguistics, Subject (documents), Computer science, Predicate (mathematical logic)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Transitive Adjectives Really Exist — Research Paper | ScholarLens