Encounters with structure
Raewyn Connell
Abstract
Raewyn Connell
Abstract
A discussion of poststructuralism may be helped by reflecting on the trajectory of ideas and practices that produced it. Structuralism as an intellectual movement has had a bad press and doubtless some of that is deserved. But structuralism was more diverse and creative, and structural analysis as a procedure in social science is more important, than many now acknowledge. In this paper the author takes as data his own experience as a social scientist, and explores one trajectory through structuralism and beyond.
OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A discussion of poststructuralism may be helped by reflecting on the trajectory of ideas and practices that produced it. Structuralism as an intellectual movement has had a bad press and doubtless some of that is deserved. But structuralism was more diverse and creative, and structural analysis as a procedure in social science is more important, than many now acknowledge. In this paper the author takes as data his own experience as a social scientist, and explores one trajectory through structuralism and beyond.
Key concepts: Structuralism (philosophy of science), Sociology, Epistemology, Post structuralism, Social science, Philosophy