Improvement of Communication with Primary Care Practitioners with The Use of Emergency Department Discharge Summaries
Benjamin Ramasubbu, Lee Chien Yap, Ayman El-Gammal, Úna Kennedy
Abstract
Benjamin Ramasubbu, Lee Chien Yap, Ayman El-Gammal, Úna Kennedy
Abstract
Objective: To assess the quality of documentation and the frequency of provision of discharge summaries to general practitioners (GP) for patients discharged from our emergency department (ED). Material and Methods: The ED records of 50 patients who presented to the ED and who had been discharged to self-care or the care of their GP on an arbitrarily chosen day were selected for auditing. A pre-formatted computerised discharge summary was then introduced to the ED and the first 50 consecutive electronic discharge summaries of patients who visited the ED were selected for auditing. Results: In the first audit cycle, a diagnosis was documented in 78% of cases. Documentation of key investigation results was present in 84% of cases. Documentation that a prescription was provided to the patient was present in 46% of cases. Documentation of appropriate follow-up care and self-care instructions was demonstrated in 68% and 50% of cases. Of those discharged to GP care, none had documentation that a GP letter was sent or a copy attached. Second cycle: GP correspondence letters were sent and a copy saved in all cases. A diagnosis, follow-up care plan and results of key investigations were documented in 100% of discharge summaries. Self-care instructions on discharge were documented in 94% of cases. Conclusion: The introduction of electronic discharge summaries improved the quality and safety of the discharge process within our emergency department and paves the way for further improvements in information transfer technology. (JAEM 2014; 13: 22-5)
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To assess the quality of documentation and the frequency of provision of discharge summaries to general practitioners (GP) for patients discharged from our emergency department (ED). Material and Methods: The ED records of 50 patients who presented to the ED and who had been discharged to self-care or the care of their GP on an arbitrarily chosen day were selected for auditing. A pre-formatted computerised discharge summary was then introduced to the ED and the first 50 consecutive electronic discharge summaries of patients who visited the ED were selected for auditing. Results: In the first audit cycle, a diagnosis was documented in 78% of cases. Documentation of key investigation results was present in 84% of cases. Documentation that a prescription was provided to the patient was present in 46% of cases. Documentation of appropriate follow-up care and self-care instructions was demonstrated in 68% and 50% of cases. Of those discharged to GP care, none had documentation that a GP letter was sent or a copy attached. Second cycle: GP correspondence letters were sent and a copy saved in all cases. A diagnosis, follow-up care plan and results of key investigations were documented in 100% of discharge summaries. Self-care instructions on discharge were documented in 94% of cases. Conclusion: The introduction of electronic discharge summaries improved the quality and safety of the discharge process within our emergency department and paves the way for further improvements in information transfer technology. (JAEM 2014; 13: 22-5)
Key concepts: Primary care, Medicine, Emergency department, Medical emergency, Family medicine, Nursing