Must Respondent Selection Procedures for Telephone Surveys Be Invasive?
Dan E. Hagan, Charlotte Meier Collier
Abstract
Dan E. Hagan, Charlotte Meier Collier
Abstract
Two respondent selection procedures are compared in a combination telephone and mail survey involving a national probability sample of over 2,500 telephone households. One procedure asks two household composition questions in order to select a respondent randomly. The alternative asks no preliminary questions. Two hypotheses are proposed: (1) The alternative approach will result in fewer refusals at the respondent selection phase because no obtrusive household composition questions are asked, and (2) the integrity of the demographic profile of the resulting sample will not be compromised. Both hypotheses are accepted.
OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two respondent selection procedures are compared in a combination telephone and mail survey involving a national probability sample of over 2,500 telephone households. One procedure asks two household composition questions in order to select a respondent randomly. The alternative asks no preliminary questions. Two hypotheses are proposed: (1) The alternative approach will result in fewer refusals at the respondent selection phase because no obtrusive household composition questions are asked, and (2) the integrity of the demographic profile of the resulting sample will not be compromised. Both hypotheses are accepted.
Key concepts: Respondent, Corporation, Library science, Rand corporation, Management, Sociology, Political science, Computer science