1985Journal of General VirologyRequires access

Comparisons between the Primary Structure of the Coat Proteins of Turnip Yellow Mosaic Virus and Eggplant Mosaic Virus

Adrien Dupin, Daniel Collot, R. Peter, Jean‐François Witz

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Comparison of the primary structures of eggplant mosaic virus (EMV) and turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) coat proteins shows that 32% of their amino acids are conserved. Alignment of the two sequences requires only one deletion near the N terminus and two insertions at the C terminus of TYMV coat protein. Although the coat protein of EMV is on average less hydrophobic than that of TYMV, structural predictions yield fairly similar conformations for the two proteins, apart from the N terminus. Neither coat protein possesses an accumulation of basic residues able to form the strong ionic RNA-protein interactions observed in serveral other isometric viruses. The nature of the amino acid exchanges seems to be different from that seen in families of homologous proteins. The highly conserved regions encompass a (probably weak) potential RNA-protein interaction site. Implications for the structure and stability of small isometric viruses are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY Comparison of the primary structures of eggplant mosaic virus (EMV) and turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) coat proteins shows that 32% of their amino acids are conserved. Alignment of the two sequences requires only one deletion near the N terminus and two insertions at the C terminus of TYMV coat protein. Although the coat protein of EMV is on average less hydrophobic than that of TYMV, structural predictions yield fairly similar conformations for the two proteins, apart from the N terminus. Neither coat protein possesses an accumulation of basic residues able to form the strong ionic RNA-protein interactions observed in serveral other isometric viruses. The nature of the amino acid exchanges seems to be different from that seen in families of homologous proteins. The highly conserved regions encompass a (probably weak) potential RNA-protein interaction site. Implications for the structure and stability of small isometric viruses are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY Comparison of the primary structures of eggplant mosaic virus (EMV) and turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) coat proteins shows that 32% of their amino acids are conserved. Alignment of the two sequences requires only one deletion near the N terminus and two insertions at the C terminus of TYMV coat protein. Although the coat protein of EMV is on average less hydrophobic than that of TYMV, structural predictions yield fairly similar conformations for the two proteins, apart from the N terminus. Neither coat protein possesses an accumulation of basic residues able to form the strong ionic RNA-protein interactions observed in serveral other isometric viruses. The nature of the amino acid exchanges seems to be different from that seen in families of homologous proteins. The highly conserved regions encompass a (probably weak) potential RNA-protein interaction site. Implications for the structure and stability of small isometric viruses are discussed.

Key concepts: Turnip yellow mosaic virus, Biology, Coat protein, RNA, Mosaic virus, Coat, Virus, Plant virus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparisons between the Primary Structure of the Coat Proteins of Turnip Yellow Mosaic Virus and Eggplant Mosaic Virus — Research Paper | ScholarLens