1995Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaRequires access

In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in unexplained infertility and minimal peritoneal endometriosis

Tom Gunnar Tanbo, Anne Katerine Omland, Per Olav Dale, Thomas Åbyholm

Open publisher page 61 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcome of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis comparing results of stimulation, sperm characteristics, cleavage, implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with unexplained infertility and peritoneal endometriosis associated infertility. Couples with tubal infertility constituted a control group. RESULTS: In the unexplained infertility and endometriosis groups similar response to stimulation, similar sperm characteristics and cleavage rates were observed. Compared with tubal infertility lower sperm motility was seen in the unexplained infertility group. Both non tubal infertility groups had lower cleavage rate than was seen in the control group. No differences in pregnancy rate were observed, but a significantly higher implantation rate was seen in unexplained infertility compared with tubal infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Couples with unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis have similar outcomes in an IVF-ET set up. Significantly lower cleavage rates in these groups compared with tubal infertility indicate gamete defects as possible causes of infertility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcome of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis comparing results of stimulation, sperm characteristics, cleavage, implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with unexplained infertility and peritoneal endometriosis associated infertility. Couples with tubal infertility constituted a control group. RESULTS: In the unexplained infertility and endometriosis groups similar response to stimulation, similar sperm characteristics and cleavage rates were observed. Compared with tubal infertility lower sperm motility was seen in the unexplained infertility group. Both non tubal infertility groups had lower cleavage rate than was seen in the control group. No differences in pregnancy rate were observed, but a significantly higher implantation rate was seen in unexplained infertility compared with tubal infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Couples with unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis have similar outcomes in an IVF-ET set up. Significantly lower cleavage rates in these groups compared with tubal infertility indicate gamete defects as possible causes of infertility.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcome of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis comparing results of stimulation, sperm characteristics, cleavage, implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with unexplained infertility and peritoneal endometriosis associated infertility. Couples with tubal infertility constituted a control group. RESULTS: In the unexplained infertility and endometriosis groups similar response to stimulation, similar sperm characteristics and cleavage rates were observed. Compared with tubal infertility lower sperm motility was seen in the unexplained infertility group. Both non tubal infertility groups had lower cleavage rate than was seen in the control group. No differences in pregnancy rate were observed, but a significantly higher implantation rate was seen in unexplained infertility compared with tubal infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Couples with unexplained infertility and infertility associated with minimal peritoneal endometriosis have similar outcomes in an IVF-ET set up. Significantly lower cleavage rates in these groups compared with tubal infertility indicate gamete defects as possible causes of infertility.

Key concepts: Endometriosis, Medicine, Unexplained infertility, Infertility, In vitro fertilisation, Embryo transfer, Gynecology, Andrology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in unexplained infertility and minimal peritoneal endometriosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens