2012•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

Vancomycin MICs do not predict the outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in correctly treated patients

Loreto Rojas, Eleonora Bunsow, P. Munoz, Emilia Cercenado, Marta Rodríguez‐Créixems, Emilio Bouza

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported a greater probability of vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 mg/L. However, previous reports included patients treated without adjustments based on vancomycin serum levels and with different methods to evaluate MICs, which may render different results. METHODS: Over a 5 year period (2005-09), vancomycin MICs were determined for 361 MRSA isolates recovered from 309 patients with bloodstream infection using microdilution and the Etest simultaneously. The relationship between the vancomycin MICs determined by each method was assessed. To assess the outcome of patients treated with vancomycin, 104 patients for whom serum vancomycin levels had been determined were selected. RESULTS: The percentage of MRSA strains with MIC values ≥ 1.5 mg/L according to the Etest was 66.5% compared with only 3.6% according to microdilution. No correlation between mortality and any MIC value obtained with either method was observed, independently of the vancomycin serum levels measured. CONCLUSIONS: There is a poor correlation between vancomycin MIC values obtained by microdilution and by Etest. No association between mortality rate and any MIC value was observed, not even in patients with suboptimal vancomycin trough serum levels. These data do not support replacing or complementing the standard microdilution test with the Etest for determination of MICs of vancomycin in microbiology laboratories.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported a greater probability of vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 mg/L. However, previous reports included patients treated without adjustments based on vancomycin serum levels and with different methods to evaluate MICs, which may render different results. METHODS: Over a 5 year period (2005-09), vancomycin MICs were determined for 361 MRSA isolates recovered from 309 patients with bloodstream infection using microdilution and the Etest simultaneously. The relationship between the vancomycin MICs determined by each method was assessed. To assess the outcome of patients treated with vancomycin, 104 patients for whom serum vancomycin levels had been determined were selected. RESULTS: The percentage of MRSA strains with MIC values ≥ 1.5 mg/L according to the Etest was 66.5% compared with only 3.6% according to microdilution. No correlation between mortality and any MIC value obtained with either method was observed, independently of the vancomycin serum levels measured. CONCLUSIONS: There is a poor correlation between vancomycin MIC values obtained by microdilution and by Etest. No association between mortality rate and any MIC value was observed, not even in patients with suboptimal vancomycin trough serum levels. These data do not support replacing or complementing the standard microdilution test with the Etest for determination of MICs of vancomycin in microbiology laboratories.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported a greater probability of vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 mg/L. However, previous reports included patients treated without adjustments based on vancomycin serum levels and with different methods to evaluate MICs, which may render different results. METHODS: Over a 5 year period (2005-09), vancomycin MICs were determined for 361 MRSA isolates recovered from 309 patients with bloodstream infection using microdilution and the Etest simultaneously. The relationship between the vancomycin MICs determined by each method was assessed. To assess the outcome of patients treated with vancomycin, 104 patients for whom serum vancomycin levels had been determined were selected. RESULTS: The percentage of MRSA strains with MIC values ≥ 1.5 mg/L according to the Etest was 66.5% compared with only 3.6% according to microdilution. No correlation between mortality and any MIC value obtained with either method was observed, independently of the vancomycin serum levels measured. CONCLUSIONS: There is a poor correlation between vancomycin MIC values obtained by microdilution and by Etest. No association between mortality rate and any MIC value was observed, not even in patients with suboptimal vancomycin trough serum levels. These data do not support replacing or complementing the standard microdilution test with the Etest for determination of MICs of vancomycin in microbiology laboratories.

Key concepts: Etest, Vancomycin, Broth microdilution, Staphylococcus aureus, Medicine, Microbiology, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Minimum inhibitory concentration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vancomycin MICs do not predict the outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in correctly treated patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens