1995•Asian PhilosophyRequires access

White horse not horse: Making sense of a negative logic

Whalen W. Lai

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Kung‐sun Lung's thesis on ‘White Horse [is] not Horse’ has been solved by A. C. Graham on the basis of a part/whole logic and by Chad Hansen on that and a ‘mass‐noun’ hypothesis. We present it as a case of reducing White Horse to its two most telling marks and then, on the basis of the good Sense (instead of Reference) in a Negative Logic—the pragmatics of locating X as the remainder left over when all non‐X's have been removed—show how a stable hand, receiving an order for White Horse would scan first for Horse by removing all non‐horse shapes and then for White by removing all colours except White. This way we can prove how indeed “A request for White Horse cannot be satisfied by Black and Brown that fills an order for Horse... (because) to exclude some colour [in the second scan] is not the same as to exclude yet no colour [in the first scan].” No part/whole or mass‐sum is presumed. The whole discussion is set in the context of shifting criteria for judging name from Confucius to Hsun‐tzu.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Kung‐sun Lung's thesis on ‘White Horse [is] not Horse’ has been solved by A. C. Graham on the basis of a part/whole logic and by Chad Hansen on that and a ‘mass‐noun’ hypothesis. We present it as a case of reducing White Horse to its two most telling marks and then, on the basis of the good Sense (instead of Reference) in a Negative Logic—the pragmatics of locating X as the remainder left over when all non‐X's have been removed—show how a stable hand, receiving an order for White Horse would scan first for Horse by removing all non‐horse shapes and then for White by removing all colours except White. This way we can prove how indeed “A request for White Horse cannot be satisfied by Black and Brown that fills an order for Horse... (because) to exclude some colour [in the second scan] is not the same as to exclude yet no colour [in the first scan].” No part/whole or mass‐sum is presumed. The whole discussion is set in the context of shifting criteria for judging name from Confucius to Hsun‐tzu.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Kung‐sun Lung's thesis on ‘White Horse [is] not Horse’ has been solved by A. C. Graham on the basis of a part/whole logic and by Chad Hansen on that and a ‘mass‐noun’ hypothesis. We present it as a case of reducing White Horse to its two most telling marks and then, on the basis of the good Sense (instead of Reference) in a Negative Logic—the pragmatics of locating X as the remainder left over when all non‐X's have been removed—show how a stable hand, receiving an order for White Horse would scan first for Horse by removing all non‐horse shapes and then for White by removing all colours except White. This way we can prove how indeed “A request for White Horse cannot be satisfied by Black and Brown that fills an order for Horse... (because) to exclude some colour [in the second scan] is not the same as to exclude yet no colour [in the first scan].” No part/whole or mass‐sum is presumed. The whole discussion is set in the context of shifting criteria for judging name from Confucius to Hsun‐tzu.

Key concepts: White (mutation), Context (archaeology), Horse, Pragmatics, Set (abstract data type), Noun, Mathematics, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
White horse not horse: Making sense of a negative logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens