2005Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Capacity at Intersections Without Traffic Signals

Werner Brilon, Thorsten Miltner

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

Two-way stop control is a form of intersection operation in widespread use. Calculations of the level of service are usually based on gap acceptance theory. In the American Highway Capacity Manual, the influence of pedestrians is considered an impedance factor, whereas in the German guideline the influence of pedestrians and bicyclists has not been considered so far. To close this gap, an alternative calculation method, called the conflict technique, has been developed. This method allows consideration of the influence of nonmotorized road users on the traffic performance of motor vehicles. Moreover, the method provides a significant simplification of the entire theoretical approach. Different modalities of operation, such as a zebra crossing at the entries to an intersection, can be considered, as can the fact that some road users do not comply with the priority rules. It is possible to calculate the capacity for one movement from the minor stream from a single equation. To calibrate the calculation method, traffic at several intersections was observed by video and analyzed for traffic volumes, delays, compliance with priority rules, and other parameters. With these field measurements, the calculation method was calibrated to actual road-user behavior. Comparison of the conventional calculation concept based on gap acceptance and the new conflict technique showed that they provide similar results. In particular, the consideration of pedestrians and limited priority effects is a considerable benefit of the new method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two-way stop control is a form of intersection operation in widespread use. Calculations of the level of service are usually based on gap acceptance theory. In the American Highway Capacity Manual, the influence of pedestrians is considered an impedance factor, whereas in the German guideline the influence of pedestrians and bicyclists has not been considered so far. To close this gap, an alternative calculation method, called the conflict technique, has been developed. This method allows consideration of the influence of nonmotorized road users on the traffic performance of motor vehicles. Moreover, the method provides a significant simplification of the entire theoretical approach. Different modalities of operation, such as a zebra crossing at the entries to an intersection, can be considered, as can the fact that some road users do not comply with the priority rules. It is possible to calculate the capacity for one movement from the minor stream from a single equation. To calibrate the calculation method, traffic at several intersections was observed by video and analyzed for traffic volumes, delays, compliance with priority rules, and other parameters. With these field measurements, the calculation method was calibrated to actual road-user behavior. Comparison of the conventional calculation concept based on gap acceptance and the new conflict technique showed that they provide similar results. In particular, the consideration of pedestrians and limited priority effects is a considerable benefit of the new method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two-way stop control is a form of intersection operation in widespread use. Calculations of the level of service are usually based on gap acceptance theory. In the American Highway Capacity Manual, the influence of pedestrians is considered an impedance factor, whereas in the German guideline the influence of pedestrians and bicyclists has not been considered so far. To close this gap, an alternative calculation method, called the conflict technique, has been developed. This method allows consideration of the influence of nonmotorized road users on the traffic performance of motor vehicles. Moreover, the method provides a significant simplification of the entire theoretical approach. Different modalities of operation, such as a zebra crossing at the entries to an intersection, can be considered, as can the fact that some road users do not comply with the priority rules. It is possible to calculate the capacity for one movement from the minor stream from a single equation. To calibrate the calculation method, traffic at several intersections was observed by video and analyzed for traffic volumes, delays, compliance with priority rules, and other parameters. With these field measurements, the calculation method was calibrated to actual road-user behavior. Comparison of the conventional calculation concept based on gap acceptance and the new conflict technique showed that they provide similar results. In particular, the consideration of pedestrians and limited priority effects is a considerable benefit of the new method.

Key concepts: Intersection (aeronautics), Computer science, Highway Capacity Manual, Transport engineering, Level of service, Simulation, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capacity at Intersections Without Traffic Signals — Research Paper | ScholarLens