2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Third workshop on software quality

Bernard Wong, June Verner, Sunita Chulani, Barry Boehm

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

To develop software on time and within budget is not good enough if the software produced is full of defects. As the software market matures, users want to be assured of quality. They no longer accept claims made by the IT department at face value, but expect concrete demonstrations of quality. Software stakeholders are also demanding higher quality software than ever before. In recent years, much software engineering research has focussed on standards, methodologies and techniques for improving software quality, measuring software quality and software quality assurance. Most of this research is focused on an internal view of quality whereas few measures of the customer view of quality exist. The Third Workshop on Software Quality aims to bring together academic, industrial and commercial communities interested in software quality topics to discuss the different technologies being defined and used in the software quality area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To develop software on time and within budget is not good enough if the software produced is full of defects. As the software market matures, users want to be assured of quality. They no longer accept claims made by the IT department at face value, but expect concrete demonstrations of quality. Software stakeholders are also demanding higher quality software than ever before. In recent years, much software engineering research has focussed on standards, methodologies and techniques for improving software quality, measuring software quality and software quality assurance. Most of this research is focused on an internal view of quality whereas few measures of the customer view of quality exist. The Third Workshop on Software Quality aims to bring together academic, industrial and commercial communities interested in software quality topics to discuss the different technologies being defined and used in the software quality area.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To develop software on time and within budget is not good enough if the software produced is full of defects. As the software market matures, users want to be assured of quality. They no longer accept claims made by the IT department at face value, but expect concrete demonstrations of quality. Software stakeholders are also demanding higher quality software than ever before. In recent years, much software engineering research has focussed on standards, methodologies and techniques for improving software quality, measuring software quality and software quality assurance. Most of this research is focused on an internal view of quality whereas few measures of the customer view of quality exist. The Third Workshop on Software Quality aims to bring together academic, industrial and commercial communities interested in software quality topics to discuss the different technologies being defined and used in the software quality area.

Key concepts: Software quality control, Software quality analyst, Software quality, Software quality assurance, Software quality management, Computer science, Quality (philosophy), Software construction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Third workshop on software quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens