Comparing Desegregation Intervention Strategies
Brian L. Fife
Abstract
Brian L. Fife
Abstract
The author examines the question of which type of desegregation plan most effectively reduces segregation in American public schools. This study departs from previous research in that the school desegregation plans are not categorized as mandatory and voluntary. Rather, a choice-assignment continuum is created to account for more of the variation between diverse desegregation orders that have been implemented in urban America. By several rigid criteria, desegregation plans relying on assignment techniques reduce the level of segregation to a greater degree than choice techniques.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author examines the question of which type of desegregation plan most effectively reduces segregation in American public schools. This study departs from previous research in that the school desegregation plans are not categorized as mandatory and voluntary. Rather, a choice-assignment continuum is created to account for more of the variation between diverse desegregation orders that have been implemented in urban America. By several rigid criteria, desegregation plans relying on assignment techniques reduce the level of segregation to a greater degree than choice techniques.
Key concepts: Desegregation, Intervention (counseling), Racial composition, School choice, Plan (archaeology), Variation (astronomy), Political science, Sociology