1990Biological Journal of the Linnean SocietyRequires access

Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny

Peter K. Endress

Open publisher page 159 citations

Abstract

Among the flowering plants flowers are relatively closed systems of a considerable complexity and therefore more suitable for comparative developmental studies than other organs. They work with a few kinds of structural elements that occur in variable or fixed numbers and are arranged in patterns more or less constrained by developmental conditions. Diversity of floral structure occurs at different levels, with emphasis either on number and arrangement or on synorganization and form of the structural elements. The first level is shown here with examples of several representatives of the primitive subclasses Magnoliidae and Hamamelididae, the second with Asclepiadaceae representing the most advanced subclass of dicotyledons Asteridae. Although early ontogenetic patterns are fairly constant among larger groups, especially the sequence of initiation and position of the different classes of structural elements, there is no strict stability in any of the parameters studied.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Among the flowering plants flowers are relatively closed systems of a considerable complexity and therefore more suitable for comparative developmental studies than other organs. They work with a few kinds of structural elements that occur in variable or fixed numbers and are arranged in patterns more or less constrained by developmental conditions. Diversity of floral structure occurs at different levels, with emphasis either on number and arrangement or on synorganization and form of the structural elements. The first level is shown here with examples of several representatives of the primitive subclasses Magnoliidae and Hamamelididae, the second with Asclepiadaceae representing the most advanced subclass of dicotyledons Asteridae. Although early ontogenetic patterns are fairly constant among larger groups, especially the sequence of initiation and position of the different classes of structural elements, there is no strict stability in any of the parameters studied.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 159 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Among the flowering plants flowers are relatively closed systems of a considerable complexity and therefore more suitable for comparative developmental studies than other organs. They work with a few kinds of structural elements that occur in variable or fixed numbers and are arranged in patterns more or less constrained by developmental conditions. Diversity of floral structure occurs at different levels, with emphasis either on number and arrangement or on synorganization and form of the structural elements. The first level is shown here with examples of several representatives of the primitive subclasses Magnoliidae and Hamamelididae, the second with Asclepiadaceae representing the most advanced subclass of dicotyledons Asteridae. Although early ontogenetic patterns are fairly constant among larger groups, especially the sequence of initiation and position of the different classes of structural elements, there is no strict stability in any of the parameters studied.

Key concepts: Biology, Ontogeny, Phylogenetics, Evolutionary biology, Zoology, Gene, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny — Research Paper | ScholarLens