Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny
Peter K. Endress
Abstract
Peter K. Endress
Abstract
Among the flowering plants flowers are relatively closed systems of a considerable complexity and therefore more suitable for comparative developmental studies than other organs. They work with a few kinds of structural elements that occur in variable or fixed numbers and are arranged in patterns more or less constrained by developmental conditions. Diversity of floral structure occurs at different levels, with emphasis either on number and arrangement or on synorganization and form of the structural elements. The first level is shown here with examples of several representatives of the primitive subclasses Magnoliidae and Hamamelididae, the second with Asclepiadaceae representing the most advanced subclass of dicotyledons Asteridae. Although early ontogenetic patterns are fairly constant among larger groups, especially the sequence of initiation and position of the different classes of structural elements, there is no strict stability in any of the parameters studied.
OpenAlex reports 159 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Among the flowering plants flowers are relatively closed systems of a considerable complexity and therefore more suitable for comparative developmental studies than other organs. They work with a few kinds of structural elements that occur in variable or fixed numbers and are arranged in patterns more or less constrained by developmental conditions. Diversity of floral structure occurs at different levels, with emphasis either on number and arrangement or on synorganization and form of the structural elements. The first level is shown here with examples of several representatives of the primitive subclasses Magnoliidae and Hamamelididae, the second with Asclepiadaceae representing the most advanced subclass of dicotyledons Asteridae. Although early ontogenetic patterns are fairly constant among larger groups, especially the sequence of initiation and position of the different classes of structural elements, there is no strict stability in any of the parameters studied.
Key concepts: Biology, Ontogeny, Phylogenetics, Evolutionary biology, Zoology, Gene, Genetics