2000•Event ManagementRequires access

Event Evaluation Research

Jack C Carlsen, Donald Getz, Geoffrey N. Soutar

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

This article describes the results of an investigation of the current use and importance of event evaluation criteria by tourism destination authorities (TDAs). The study involved a Delphi survey of Australian and international experts in event evaluation from the public and private sector. Both pre- and postevent evaluation criteria were investigated. The importance of alternative methodological issues, including return on investment (RoI), use of multipliers, and the issue of time switching and event-related travel, was also investigated. The results demonstrate consensus on the frequency of use and importance of a range of criteria and provide a platform for the development of a standardized approach to pre- and postevent evaluation. These pre- and postevent criteria are discussed in detail, and factors that should be considered when framing a model for standardized evaluation of events are suggested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes the results of an investigation of the current use and importance of event evaluation criteria by tourism destination authorities (TDAs). The study involved a Delphi survey of Australian and international experts in event evaluation from the public and private sector. Both pre- and postevent evaluation criteria were investigated. The importance of alternative methodological issues, including return on investment (RoI), use of multipliers, and the issue of time switching and event-related travel, was also investigated. The results demonstrate consensus on the frequency of use and importance of a range of criteria and provide a platform for the development of a standardized approach to pre- and postevent evaluation. These pre- and postevent criteria are discussed in detail, and factors that should be considered when framing a model for standardized evaluation of events are suggested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes the results of an investigation of the current use and importance of event evaluation criteria by tourism destination authorities (TDAs). The study involved a Delphi survey of Australian and international experts in event evaluation from the public and private sector. Both pre- and postevent evaluation criteria were investigated. The importance of alternative methodological issues, including return on investment (RoI), use of multipliers, and the issue of time switching and event-related travel, was also investigated. The results demonstrate consensus on the frequency of use and importance of a range of criteria and provide a platform for the development of a standardized approach to pre- and postevent evaluation. These pre- and postevent criteria are discussed in detail, and factors that should be considered when framing a model for standardized evaluation of events are suggested.

Key concepts: Event (particle physics), Event management, Tourism, History, Marketing, Business, Archaeology, Critical success factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Event Evaluation Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens