2013Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series II Forestry • Wood Industry • Agricultural Food EngineeringRequires access

A comparative study on the degradation of fir (Abies alba mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in UC3.

Maria Cristina Timar, Emanuela Beldean

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative investigation of fir (Abies alba) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) degradation after 7 years exposure in outdoors, above ground conditions (UC3), in a modified L-joint test. It refers only to the complex degradation of untreated samples revealed by non- destructive and destructive evaluation. Almost a similar degradation of fir and beech was observed by non-destructive evaluation of exposed faces and tenons. In contrast, destructive evaluation of the longitudinally sliced samples highlighted distinct differences between the two wood species. Inner biological degradation of beech was far more advanced than for fir, revealing its lower natural durability compared to fir, even in these out of soil contact conditions. Therefore, utilisation of beech in UC3 applications should be carefully considered alongside adequate efficient treatments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper presents a comparative investigation of fir (Abies alba) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) degradation after 7 years exposure in outdoors, above ground conditions (UC3), in a modified L-joint test. It refers only to the complex degradation of untreated samples revealed by non- destructive and destructive evaluation. Almost a similar degradation of fir and beech was observed by non-destructive evaluation of exposed faces and tenons. In contrast, destructive evaluation of the longitudinally sliced samples highlighted distinct differences between the two wood species. Inner biological degradation of beech was far more advanced than for fir, revealing its lower natural durability compared to fir, even in these out of soil contact conditions. Therefore, utilisation of beech in UC3 applications should be carefully considered alongside adequate efficient treatments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper presents a comparative investigation of fir (Abies alba) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) degradation after 7 years exposure in outdoors, above ground conditions (UC3), in a modified L-joint test. It refers only to the complex degradation of untreated samples revealed by non- destructive and destructive evaluation. Almost a similar degradation of fir and beech was observed by non-destructive evaluation of exposed faces and tenons. In contrast, destructive evaluation of the longitudinally sliced samples highlighted distinct differences between the two wood species. Inner biological degradation of beech was far more advanced than for fir, revealing its lower natural durability compared to fir, even in these out of soil contact conditions. Therefore, utilisation of beech in UC3 applications should be carefully considered alongside adequate efficient treatments.

Key concepts: Beech, Fagus sylvatica, Abies alba, Fagus orientalis, Degradation (telecommunications), Botany, Picea abies, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study on the degradation of fir (Abies alba mill.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in UC3. — Research Paper | ScholarLens