2005Journal of Sedimentary ResearchRequires access

Quantitative Heavy-Mineral Analysis of a Pliocene Beach Placer Deposit in Southeastern Australia Using the AutoGeoSEM

Mark Paine, Ravi Anand, Mehrooz Aspandiar, R. W. Fitzpatrick, Michael Verrall

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Abstract Thirty-two heavy-mineral separates, each comprising approximately 2000 grains, were analyzed using the Automatic Geological Scanning Electron Microscope (AutoGeoSEM). This analysis was undertaken to study the influence of depositional environment on the distribution of heavy minerals throughout a regressive Pliocene coastal sequence. The majority of these heavy minerals were separated from the Loxton-Parilla sands, the host of the Bondi Main heavy-mineral beach placer deposit in the Murray Basin of southeastern Australia. The remaining heavy minerals were separated from a number of other Neogene units encountered at the deposit. The heavy-mineral suite is dominated by stable to ultrastable minerals such as zircon, rutile, and tourmaline, along with ilmenite, various intermediate titanates, and anatase. Sillimanite, andalusite, topaz, chrome spinel/chromite, monazite, and muscovite also occur. These heavy minerals are heterogeneously distributed throughout both the Loxton-Parilla sands and the remaining Neogene units. The main process controlling the heterogeneous distribution of these heavy minerals throughout the Loxton-Parilla sands appears to have been the hydraulic conditions, which are intimately linked with the environment of deposition. Consequently, the dense heavy minerals (density > ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in relatively high-energy environments such as the breaker zone and swash zone. The less dense heavy minerals (density < ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in the shoaling zone and shelf environments. The erratic distribution of the various heavy minerals in some of the other Neogene units is also apparently due to varying depositional conditions. Postdepositional weathering has altered the heavy-mineral assemblages in all units. Accordingly, some primary minerals, such as ilmenite, appear to have altered to secondary minerals, such as pseudorutile and anatase.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Thirty-two heavy-mineral separates, each comprising approximately 2000 grains, were analyzed using the Automatic Geological Scanning Electron Microscope (AutoGeoSEM). This analysis was undertaken to study the influence of depositional environment on the distribution of heavy minerals throughout a regressive Pliocene coastal sequence. The majority of these heavy minerals were separated from the Loxton-Parilla sands, the host of the Bondi Main heavy-mineral beach placer deposit in the Murray Basin of southeastern Australia. The remaining heavy minerals were separated from a number of other Neogene units encountered at the deposit. The heavy-mineral suite is dominated by stable to ultrastable minerals such as zircon, rutile, and tourmaline, along with ilmenite, various intermediate titanates, and anatase. Sillimanite, andalusite, topaz, chrome spinel/chromite, monazite, and muscovite also occur. These heavy minerals are heterogeneously distributed throughout both the Loxton-Parilla sands and the remaining Neogene units. The main process controlling the heterogeneous distribution of these heavy minerals throughout the Loxton-Parilla sands appears to have been the hydraulic conditions, which are intimately linked with the environment of deposition. Consequently, the dense heavy minerals (density > ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in relatively high-energy environments such as the breaker zone and swash zone. The less dense heavy minerals (density < ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in the shoaling zone and shelf environments. The erratic distribution of the various heavy minerals in some of the other Neogene units is also apparently due to varying depositional conditions. Postdepositional weathering has altered the heavy-mineral assemblages in all units. Accordingly, some primary minerals, such as ilmenite, appear to have altered to secondary minerals, such as pseudorutile and anatase.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Thirty-two heavy-mineral separates, each comprising approximately 2000 grains, were analyzed using the Automatic Geological Scanning Electron Microscope (AutoGeoSEM). This analysis was undertaken to study the influence of depositional environment on the distribution of heavy minerals throughout a regressive Pliocene coastal sequence. The majority of these heavy minerals were separated from the Loxton-Parilla sands, the host of the Bondi Main heavy-mineral beach placer deposit in the Murray Basin of southeastern Australia. The remaining heavy minerals were separated from a number of other Neogene units encountered at the deposit. The heavy-mineral suite is dominated by stable to ultrastable minerals such as zircon, rutile, and tourmaline, along with ilmenite, various intermediate titanates, and anatase. Sillimanite, andalusite, topaz, chrome spinel/chromite, monazite, and muscovite also occur. These heavy minerals are heterogeneously distributed throughout both the Loxton-Parilla sands and the remaining Neogene units. The main process controlling the heterogeneous distribution of these heavy minerals throughout the Loxton-Parilla sands appears to have been the hydraulic conditions, which are intimately linked with the environment of deposition. Consequently, the dense heavy minerals (density > ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in relatively high-energy environments such as the breaker zone and swash zone. The less dense heavy minerals (density < ~ 3.5 g/cm3) are concentrated in the shoaling zone and shelf environments. The erratic distribution of the various heavy minerals in some of the other Neogene units is also apparently due to varying depositional conditions. Postdepositional weathering has altered the heavy-mineral assemblages in all units. Accordingly, some primary minerals, such as ilmenite, appear to have altered to secondary minerals, such as pseudorutile and anatase.

Key concepts: Placer mining, Geology, Placer deposit, Heavy mineral, Geochemistry, Mineral, Mining engineering, Provenance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative Heavy-Mineral Analysis of a Pliocene Beach Placer Deposit in Southeastern Australia Using the AutoGeoSEM — Research Paper | ScholarLens