2010•Journal of Fish and Wildlife ManagementOpen access

Application of a Double-Observer Aerial Line-Transect Method to Estimate Brown Bear Population Density in Southwestern Alaska

Patrick B. Walsh, Joel Howard Reynolds, Gail H. Collins, Brook Russell, Michael Winfree, Jeffrey W. Denton

Open full text 55 citations

Abstract

Abstract Brown bear Ursus arctos population density was estimated for a 21,178-km2 study area in southwest Alaska. Estimates were obtained using an aerial line-transect method that allows for peak detection to be both off the transect line and less than 100%. Data collection required five small aircraft with 2-person crews. Surveys were flown in 10-d windows to capture the period after den emergence but prior to full green-up. Surveys were flown in two consecutive years in order to detect sufficient bear groups to support the estimation. The study detected 197 bear groups (330 bears) in 969 aerial transects averaging 24.8 km long and with a strip width of 728 m. Estimated population density in the study area was 40.4 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 31.4–54.5); estimated density of independent bears was 27.3 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 21.4–34.4). Assuming similar estimate precision, repeating the survey could detect population changes of approximately 38% or larger with a power of 80%. We find the method described here suitable for regions of relatively high bear population densities or detection rates.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Brown bear Ursus arctos population density was estimated for a 21,178-km2 study area in southwest Alaska. Estimates were obtained using an aerial line-transect method that allows for peak detection to be both off the transect line and less than 100%. Data collection required five small aircraft with 2-person crews. Surveys were flown in 10-d windows to capture the period after den emergence but prior to full green-up. Surveys were flown in two consecutive years in order to detect sufficient bear groups to support the estimation. The study detected 197 bear groups (330 bears) in 969 aerial transects averaging 24.8 km long and with a strip width of 728 m. Estimated population density in the study area was 40.4 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 31.4–54.5); estimated density of independent bears was 27.3 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 21.4–34.4). Assuming similar estimate precision, repeating the survey could detect population changes of approximately 38% or larger with a power of 80%. We find the method described here suitable for regions of relatively high bear population densities or detection rates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Brown bear Ursus arctos population density was estimated for a 21,178-km2 study area in southwest Alaska. Estimates were obtained using an aerial line-transect method that allows for peak detection to be both off the transect line and less than 100%. Data collection required five small aircraft with 2-person crews. Surveys were flown in 10-d windows to capture the period after den emergence but prior to full green-up. Surveys were flown in two consecutive years in order to detect sufficient bear groups to support the estimation. The study detected 197 bear groups (330 bears) in 969 aerial transects averaging 24.8 km long and with a strip width of 728 m. Estimated population density in the study area was 40.4 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 31.4–54.5); estimated density of independent bears was 27.3 bears/1,000 km2 (95% CI = 21.4–34.4). Assuming similar estimate precision, repeating the survey could detect population changes of approximately 38% or larger with a power of 80%. We find the method described here suitable for regions of relatively high bear population densities or detection rates.

Key concepts: Transect, Aerial survey, Ursus, Distance sampling, Population, Population density, Geography, Physical geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of a Double-Observer Aerial Line-Transect Method to Estimate Brown Bear Population Density in Southwestern Alaska — Research Paper | ScholarLens