1981Biology of ReproductionRequires access

Acrosin, Proacrosin, and Acrosin Inhibitor of Guinea Pig Spermatozoa Capacitated and Acrosome-Reacted in vitro

Jessie C. Goodpasture, J. M. Reddy, Lourens J.D. Zaneveld

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

Guinea pig epididymal spermatozoa were either capacitated only, or capacitated and acrosome-reacted in vitro. The spermatozoa were separated from the supernatant incubation media, the spermatozoa extracted, and the amount of acrosin, proacrosin, and acrosin inhibitor in the sperm extracts as well as in the supernatant solutions was measured. A dialyzable factor was present which inhibited proacrosin activation as well as acrosin activity, although the latter to a lesser degree, and was partially removed during the acrosome reaction. The total amount of acrosin (nonzymogen acrosin + proacrosin) in untreated, control spermatozoa was 3 to 5 times that in mouse and human spermatozoa. A reduction of ∿50% in the total amount of sperm acrosin occurred after induction of the acrosome reaction. Whether spermatozoa were untreated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted, ∿90% of the acrosin present on the spermatozoa was in proacrosin form. The loss of acrosin activity after induction of the acrosome reaction was due to its release into the surrounding medium, and all of the released enzyme was in the nonzymogen acrosin form. The amount of acrosin released from control spermatozoa kept in buffer, which underwent the “false” acrosome reaction, was approximately the same as that released from “true” acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. The total amount of acrosin released after induction of the acrosome reaction was never more than about 55% of the original amount present, even if more than 80% of the spermatozoa had undergone the acrosome reaction. Proacrosin activation apparently does not occur, or occurs only minimally, during in vitro capacitation of guinea pig spermatozoa, but approximately half is activated just before, during, or immediately after the spermatozoa show morphological changes in the acrosome, whether induced by sperm death or capacitation. Approximately the same small amount of acrosin inhibitor was released from capacitated spermatozoa as from noncapacitated spermatozoa kept in buffer that had undergone the “false” acrosome reaction. By contrast, a much higher amount of acrosin inhibitor was liberated from capacitated, acrosome-reacted spermatozoa.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Guinea pig epididymal spermatozoa were either capacitated only, or capacitated and acrosome-reacted in vitro. The spermatozoa were separated from the supernatant incubation media, the spermatozoa extracted, and the amount of acrosin, proacrosin, and acrosin inhibitor in the sperm extracts as well as in the supernatant solutions was measured. A dialyzable factor was present which inhibited proacrosin activation as well as acrosin activity, although the latter to a lesser degree, and was partially removed during the acrosome reaction. The total amount of acrosin (nonzymogen acrosin + proacrosin) in untreated, control spermatozoa was 3 to 5 times that in mouse and human spermatozoa. A reduction of ∿50% in the total amount of sperm acrosin occurred after induction of the acrosome reaction. Whether spermatozoa were untreated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted, ∿90% of the acrosin present on the spermatozoa was in proacrosin form. The loss of acrosin activity after induction of the acrosome reaction was due to its release into the surrounding medium, and all of the released enzyme was in the nonzymogen acrosin form. The amount of acrosin released from control spermatozoa kept in buffer, which underwent the “false” acrosome reaction, was approximately the same as that released from “true” acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. The total amount of acrosin released after induction of the acrosome reaction was never more than about 55% of the original amount present, even if more than 80% of the spermatozoa had undergone the acrosome reaction. Proacrosin activation apparently does not occur, or occurs only minimally, during in vitro capacitation of guinea pig spermatozoa, but approximately half is activated just before, during, or immediately after the spermatozoa show morphological changes in the acrosome, whether induced by sperm death or capacitation. Approximately the same small amount of acrosin inhibitor was released from capacitated spermatozoa as from noncapacitated spermatozoa kept in buffer that had undergone the “false” acrosome reaction. By contrast, a much higher amount of acrosin inhibitor was liberated from capacitated, acrosome-reacted spermatozoa.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Guinea pig epididymal spermatozoa were either capacitated only, or capacitated and acrosome-reacted in vitro. The spermatozoa were separated from the supernatant incubation media, the spermatozoa extracted, and the amount of acrosin, proacrosin, and acrosin inhibitor in the sperm extracts as well as in the supernatant solutions was measured. A dialyzable factor was present which inhibited proacrosin activation as well as acrosin activity, although the latter to a lesser degree, and was partially removed during the acrosome reaction. The total amount of acrosin (nonzymogen acrosin + proacrosin) in untreated, control spermatozoa was 3 to 5 times that in mouse and human spermatozoa. A reduction of ∿50% in the total amount of sperm acrosin occurred after induction of the acrosome reaction. Whether spermatozoa were untreated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted, ∿90% of the acrosin present on the spermatozoa was in proacrosin form. The loss of acrosin activity after induction of the acrosome reaction was due to its release into the surrounding medium, and all of the released enzyme was in the nonzymogen acrosin form. The amount of acrosin released from control spermatozoa kept in buffer, which underwent the “false” acrosome reaction, was approximately the same as that released from “true” acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. The total amount of acrosin released after induction of the acrosome reaction was never more than about 55% of the original amount present, even if more than 80% of the spermatozoa had undergone the acrosome reaction. Proacrosin activation apparently does not occur, or occurs only minimally, during in vitro capacitation of guinea pig spermatozoa, but approximately half is activated just before, during, or immediately after the spermatozoa show morphological changes in the acrosome, whether induced by sperm death or capacitation. Approximately the same small amount of acrosin inhibitor was released from capacitated spermatozoa as from noncapacitated spermatozoa kept in buffer that had undergone the “false” acrosome reaction. By contrast, a much higher amount of acrosin inhibitor was liberated from capacitated, acrosome-reacted spermatozoa.

Key concepts: Acrosin, Acrosome, Acrosome reaction, Capacitation, Sperm, Andrology, Biology, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acrosin, Proacrosin, and Acrosin Inhibitor of Guinea Pig Spermatozoa Capacitated and Acrosome-Reacted in vitro — Research Paper | ScholarLens