2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Changing Definitions of Deviance

John Curra

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Almost all deviance fits into what Adler and Adler refer to as the ABCs of deviance: beliefs (attitudes), acts (behaviors), or traits (conditions). Social groups or audiences may have a particular collective or agreed-upon judgment of someone's attitudes, behaviors, and conditions, with which that individual strongly disagrees. Social control creates deviance by naming, labeling, or categorizing some attitudes, behaviors, or conditions as types of deviance, separating them from other attitudes, behaviors, or conditions that are considered to be proper or even desirable. The Thomas theorem reminds us that humans respond to the meanings or definitions of some situation, not necessarily (or even) to its objective characteristics. Mills' analysis of the professional ideology of social pathologists demonstrated that definitions of social deviance and social problems always reflect some specific group's view of what is proper or improper; norms reflect the power, interests, and outlooks of the groups that create them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Almost all deviance fits into what Adler and Adler refer to as the ABCs of deviance: beliefs (attitudes), acts (behaviors), or traits (conditions). Social groups or audiences may have a particular collective or agreed-upon judgment of someone's attitudes, behaviors, and conditions, with which that individual strongly disagrees. Social control creates deviance by naming, labeling, or categorizing some attitudes, behaviors, or conditions as types of deviance, separating them from other attitudes, behaviors, or conditions that are considered to be proper or even desirable. The Thomas theorem reminds us that humans respond to the meanings or definitions of some situation, not necessarily (or even) to its objective characteristics. Mills' analysis of the professional ideology of social pathologists demonstrated that definitions of social deviance and social problems always reflect some specific group's view of what is proper or improper; norms reflect the power, interests, and outlooks of the groups that create them.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Almost all deviance fits into what Adler and Adler refer to as the ABCs of deviance: beliefs (attitudes), acts (behaviors), or traits (conditions). Social groups or audiences may have a particular collective or agreed-upon judgment of someone's attitudes, behaviors, and conditions, with which that individual strongly disagrees. Social control creates deviance by naming, labeling, or categorizing some attitudes, behaviors, or conditions as types of deviance, separating them from other attitudes, behaviors, or conditions that are considered to be proper or even desirable. The Thomas theorem reminds us that humans respond to the meanings or definitions of some situation, not necessarily (or even) to its objective characteristics. Mills' analysis of the professional ideology of social pathologists demonstrated that definitions of social deviance and social problems always reflect some specific group's view of what is proper or improper; norms reflect the power, interests, and outlooks of the groups that create them.

Key concepts: Deviance (statistics), Computer science, Mathematics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Changing Definitions of Deviance — Research Paper | ScholarLens