Ryser's embedding problem for Hadamard matrices
T. S. Michael
Abstract
Open-access reader
T. S. Michael
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract What is the minimum order ${\cal R}\,(a, b)$ of a Hadamard matrix that contains an a by b submatrix of all 1's? Newman showed that where c♯ denotes the smallest order greater than or equal to c for which a Hadamard matrix exists. It follows that if 4 divides both a and b, and if the Hadamard conjecture is true, then ${\cal R}(a,b)=ab$ . We establish the improved bounds for min {a,b} ≥ 2. The Hadamard conjecture therefore implies that if 4 divides both 2ab and ⌈a/2⌉ ⌈b/2⌉, then ${\cal R}$ (a, b) = 2 · max {⌈a/2⌉b, ⌈b/2⌉a}. Our lower bound comes from a counting argument, while our upper bound follows from a sub‐multiplicative property of ${\cal R}$ : Improvements in our upper bound occur when suitable conference matrices or Bush‐type Hadamard matrices exist. We conjecture that any (1,−1)‐matrix of size a by b occurs as a submatrix of some Hadamard matrix of order at most ${\cal R}(a,b)$ . © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract What is the minimum order ${\cal R}\,(a, b)$ of a Hadamard matrix that contains an a by b submatrix of all 1's? Newman showed that where c♯ denotes the smallest order greater than or equal to c for which a Hadamard matrix exists. It follows that if 4 divides both a and b, and if the Hadamard conjecture is true, then ${\cal R}(a,b)=ab$ . We establish the improved bounds for min {a,b} ≥ 2. The Hadamard conjecture therefore implies that if 4 divides both 2ab and ⌈a/2⌉ ⌈b/2⌉, then ${\cal R}$ (a, b) = 2 · max {⌈a/2⌉b, ⌈b/2⌉a}. Our lower bound comes from a counting argument, while our upper bound follows from a sub‐multiplicative property of ${\cal R}$ : Improvements in our upper bound occur when suitable conference matrices or Bush‐type Hadamard matrices exist. We conjecture that any (1,−1)‐matrix of size a by b occurs as a submatrix of some Hadamard matrix of order at most ${\cal R}(a,b)$ . © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs
Key concepts: Mathematics, Hadamard matrix, Combinatorics, Hadamard transform, Hadamard's maximal determinant problem, Conjecture, Order (exchange), Upper and lower bounds