1961Canadian Journal of ChemistryOpen access

THE HELLMANN–FEYNMAN THEOREM AND CHEMICAL BINDING

Richard F. W. Bader, Glenys A. Jones

Open full text 59 citations

Abstract

The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical binding are illustrated. It is shown that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the general expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibonding properties in molecular orbital theory are misleading and that few orbitals are, in actual fact, antibonding. If molecular orbitals are classified as netbonding or netantibonding, terms which are precisely defined and have a definite physical significance, a much closer correlation with previous concepts of bonding is obtained. The effects of mutual orthogonalization within a set of orbitals are studied. It is found that this procedure decreases the bonding ability of bonding orbitals, but increases that of antibonding orbitals. The dangers of disregarding such orthogonalization in a conventional calculation are clearly illustrated.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical binding are illustrated. It is shown that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the general expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibonding properties in molecular orbital theory are misleading and that few orbitals are, in actual fact, antibonding. If molecular orbitals are classified as netbonding or netantibonding, terms which are precisely defined and have a definite physical significance, a much closer correlation with previous concepts of bonding is obtained. The effects of mutual orthogonalization within a set of orbitals are studied. It is found that this procedure decreases the bonding ability of bonding orbitals, but increases that of antibonding orbitals. The dangers of disregarding such orthogonalization in a conventional calculation are clearly illustrated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical binding are illustrated. It is shown that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the general expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibonding properties in molecular orbital theory are misleading and that few orbitals are, in actual fact, antibonding. If molecular orbitals are classified as netbonding or netantibonding, terms which are precisely defined and have a definite physical significance, a much closer correlation with previous concepts of bonding is obtained. The effects of mutual orthogonalization within a set of orbitals are studied. It is found that this procedure decreases the bonding ability of bonding orbitals, but increases that of antibonding orbitals. The dangers of disregarding such orthogonalization in a conventional calculation are clearly illustrated.

Key concepts: Antibonding molecular orbital, Molecular orbital theory, Molecular orbital diagram, Molecular orbital, Chemistry, Non-bonding orbital, Orthogonalization, Slater-type orbital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE HELLMANN–FEYNMAN THEOREM AND CHEMICAL BINDING — Research Paper | ScholarLens