THE HELLMANN–FEYNMAN THEOREM AND CHEMICAL BINDING
Richard F. W. Bader, Glenys A. Jones
Abstract
Open-access reader
Richard F. W. Bader, Glenys A. Jones
Abstract
Open-access reader
The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical binding are illustrated. It is shown that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the general expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibonding properties in molecular orbital theory are misleading and that few orbitals are, in actual fact, antibonding. If molecular orbitals are classified as netbonding or netantibonding, terms which are precisely defined and have a definite physical significance, a much closer correlation with previous concepts of bonding is obtained. The effects of mutual orthogonalization within a set of orbitals are studied. It is found that this procedure decreases the bonding ability of bonding orbitals, but increases that of antibonding orbitals. The dangers of disregarding such orthogonalization in a conventional calculation are clearly illustrated.
OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical binding are illustrated. It is shown that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the general expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibonding properties in molecular orbital theory are misleading and that few orbitals are, in actual fact, antibonding. If molecular orbitals are classified as netbonding or netantibonding, terms which are precisely defined and have a definite physical significance, a much closer correlation with previous concepts of bonding is obtained. The effects of mutual orthogonalization within a set of orbitals are studied. It is found that this procedure decreases the bonding ability of bonding orbitals, but increases that of antibonding orbitals. The dangers of disregarding such orthogonalization in a conventional calculation are clearly illustrated.
Key concepts: Antibonding molecular orbital, Molecular orbital theory, Molecular orbital diagram, Molecular orbital, Chemistry, Non-bonding orbital, Orthogonalization, Slater-type orbital