2011Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)Requires access

Evaluating intelligence performance: The intelligence security committee's investigations into the 7/7 London bombings

Charles Vandepeer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is a standing committee of parliamentarians responsible for the independent assessment and evaluation of the United Kingdom's intelligence agencies. Following the July 2005 bombings in London, the ISC conducted two investigations into the performance of the UK's intelligence agencies in relation to the attacks. As the ISC was made up of individuals with knowledge of the workings of intelligence agencies, their investigations were able to provide an external, independent and an informed critique of intelligence performance. This paper develops the concept of informed outsiders; people external to agencies that understand intelligence analysis, have access to all relevant information, and are able to provide practical insights to the work of intelligence agencies. The argument is that, given the inherent secrecy surrounding intelligence, such informed outsiders are critical to the development of intelligence analysis. The ISC's reports illustrate a number of systematic improvements to intelligence analysis through: an external critique of intelligence analysis; an informed perspective on the limitations of intelligence and scale of the threat; and systematic improvements through questions asked of intelligence agencies. Finally, to ensure systematic improvement of the field of intelligence analysis, the case is made for similar in-depth analysis of intelligence successes and not just investigations in response to perceived intelligence failures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is a standing committee of parliamentarians responsible for the independent assessment and evaluation of the United Kingdom's intelligence agencies. Following the July 2005 bombings in London, the ISC conducted two investigations into the performance of the UK's intelligence agencies in relation to the attacks. As the ISC was made up of individuals with knowledge of the workings of intelligence agencies, their investigations were able to provide an external, independent and an informed critique of intelligence performance. This paper develops the concept of informed outsiders; people external to agencies that understand intelligence analysis, have access to all relevant information, and are able to provide practical insights to the work of intelligence agencies. The argument is that, given the inherent secrecy surrounding intelligence, such informed outsiders are critical to the development of intelligence analysis. The ISC's reports illustrate a number of systematic improvements to intelligence analysis through: an external critique of intelligence analysis; an informed perspective on the limitations of intelligence and scale of the threat; and systematic improvements through questions asked of intelligence agencies. Finally, to ensure systematic improvement of the field of intelligence analysis, the case is made for similar in-depth analysis of intelligence successes and not just investigations in response to perceived intelligence failures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is a standing committee of parliamentarians responsible for the independent assessment and evaluation of the United Kingdom's intelligence agencies. Following the July 2005 bombings in London, the ISC conducted two investigations into the performance of the UK's intelligence agencies in relation to the attacks. As the ISC was made up of individuals with knowledge of the workings of intelligence agencies, their investigations were able to provide an external, independent and an informed critique of intelligence performance. This paper develops the concept of informed outsiders; people external to agencies that understand intelligence analysis, have access to all relevant information, and are able to provide practical insights to the work of intelligence agencies. The argument is that, given the inherent secrecy surrounding intelligence, such informed outsiders are critical to the development of intelligence analysis. The ISC's reports illustrate a number of systematic improvements to intelligence analysis through: an external critique of intelligence analysis; an informed perspective on the limitations of intelligence and scale of the threat; and systematic improvements through questions asked of intelligence agencies. Finally, to ensure systematic improvement of the field of intelligence analysis, the case is made for similar in-depth analysis of intelligence successes and not just investigations in response to perceived intelligence failures.

Key concepts: Intelligence analysis, Intelligence cycle, Military intelligence, Secrecy, Argument (complex analysis), Human intelligence, Intelligence assessment, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating intelligence performance: The intelligence security committee's investigations into the 7/7 London bombings — Research Paper | ScholarLens