2006Journal of Structural EngineeringRequires access

Distortional Buckling Tests on Cold-Formed Steel Beams

Cheng Yu, Benjamin W. Schafer

Open publisher page 153 citations

Abstract

Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 153 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions.

Key concepts: Buckling, Flange, Structural engineering, Cold-formed steel, Failure mode and effects analysis, Compression (physics), Engineering, Cold forming

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distortional Buckling Tests on Cold-Formed Steel Beams — Research Paper | ScholarLens