Concept Lattices Constrained by Equivalence Relations
Radim Bělohlávek, Vladimı́r Sklenář, Jiří Zacpal
Abstract
Radim Bělohlávek, Vladimı́r Sklenář, Jiří Zacpal
Abstract
Formal concept analysis is a method of exploratory data analysis that aims at the extraction of natural clusters from object- attribute data tables. The clusters, called formal concepts, are naturally interpreted as human-perceived concepts in a traditional sense and can be partially ordered by a subconcept-superconcept hierarchy. The hierar- chical structure of formal concepts (so-called concept lattice) represents a structured information obtained automatically from the input data ta- ble. This paper presents a preliminary study in which we deal with the problem of how further information additionally supplied with the ba- sic object-attribute data table can be utilized. The additional informa- tion we consider has the form of a binary relation on the set of ob- jects. Primarily, we focus on equivalence relations. Equivalences can be used modeling similarity, indistinguishability, etc.—a kind of informa- tion quite often supplied/available with a collection of objects. We aim at emphasizing two aspects. First, the additional information can provide a criterion for the relevance/importance of formal concepts. Only con- cepts which are in an appropriate sense compatible with the additional information are considered important. Second, selecting only important concepts means a reduction of the overall concept lattice which helps to make the resulting set of formal concepts more readable.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Formal concept analysis is a method of exploratory data analysis that aims at the extraction of natural clusters from object- attribute data tables. The clusters, called formal concepts, are naturally interpreted as human-perceived concepts in a traditional sense and can be partially ordered by a subconcept-superconcept hierarchy. The hierar- chical structure of formal concepts (so-called concept lattice) represents a structured information obtained automatically from the input data ta- ble. This paper presents a preliminary study in which we deal with the problem of how further information additionally supplied with the ba- sic object-attribute data table can be utilized. The additional informa- tion we consider has the form of a binary relation on the set of ob- jects. Primarily, we focus on equivalence relations. Equivalences can be used modeling similarity, indistinguishability, etc.—a kind of informa- tion quite often supplied/available with a collection of objects. We aim at emphasizing two aspects. First, the additional information can provide a criterion for the relevance/importance of formal concepts. Only con- cepts which are in an appropriate sense compatible with the additional information are considered important. Second, selecting only important concepts means a reduction of the overall concept lattice which helps to make the resulting set of formal concepts more readable.
Key concepts: Formal concept analysis, Binary relation, Computer science, Lattice Miner, Equivalence relation, Theoretical computer science, Equivalence (formal languages), Relevance (law)