Unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC) as a test for empty iron stores – results from the HUNT Study
Arne Åsberg, Ketil Thorstensen, Berit Borch‐Iohnsen
Abstract
Arne Åsberg, Ketil Thorstensen, Berit Borch‐Iohnsen
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When s-iron and s-transferrin are used to diagnose empty iron stores, the measurements are usually combined in the calculation of s-transferrin saturation. This may not be the best way to utilize the information in s-iron and s-transferrin, as s-transferrin alone has a better diagnostic accuracy than s-transferrin saturation. We suggest that unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC), which is s-total iron binding capacity (2 times s-transferrin) minus s-iron could be used for diagnosing empty iron stores. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we used ROC curve analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of s-iron, s-transferrin, s-transferrin saturation and s-UIBC in diagnosing empty iron stores in 3029 women of childbearing age. Empty iron stores were defined as s-ferritin less than 10 μg/L or less than 15 μg/L. RESULTS: At both definitions of empty iron stores s-UIBC had a better diagnostic accuracy than the other tests, with area under the ROC curve of 0.80-0.87. This was also the trend in a subpopulation of 172 anemic women, where the area under the ROC curve of s-UIBC was 0.92. CONCLUSION: When diagnosing empty iron stores calculation of s-UIBC is a better way to utilize the information in s-iron and s-transferrin than is calculation of s-transferrin saturation.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: When s-iron and s-transferrin are used to diagnose empty iron stores, the measurements are usually combined in the calculation of s-transferrin saturation. This may not be the best way to utilize the information in s-iron and s-transferrin, as s-transferrin alone has a better diagnostic accuracy than s-transferrin saturation. We suggest that unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC), which is s-total iron binding capacity (2 times s-transferrin) minus s-iron could be used for diagnosing empty iron stores. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we used ROC curve analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of s-iron, s-transferrin, s-transferrin saturation and s-UIBC in diagnosing empty iron stores in 3029 women of childbearing age. Empty iron stores were defined as s-ferritin less than 10 μg/L or less than 15 μg/L. RESULTS: At both definitions of empty iron stores s-UIBC had a better diagnostic accuracy than the other tests, with area under the ROC curve of 0.80-0.87. This was also the trend in a subpopulation of 172 anemic women, where the area under the ROC curve of s-UIBC was 0.92. CONCLUSION: When diagnosing empty iron stores calculation of s-UIBC is a better way to utilize the information in s-iron and s-transferrin than is calculation of s-transferrin saturation.
Key concepts: Transferrin, Transferrin saturation, Ferritin, Saturation (graph theory), Iron status, Serum iron, Transferrin receptor, Receiver operating characteristic