2013•DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

Comparison of method and result of three types of thoracoscopic lobectomy

Bo Yang, Xiangyang Chu, Weimin Dai, Yue Sun, Yang Liu, Yuqi Wang, Tao Wang, Ming Dan Zhao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the method and result of thoracoscope-assisted lobectomy, thoracoscopic lobectomy and single-port laparoscopic lobectomy, and provide a reference for choice of surgical method. Methods Clinic data of 374 patients undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy from May 2007 to May 2012 in General Hospital of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Results Three hundred and seventy-four patients were classified into 3 groups according to different surgical method. Group A included 40 patients who underwent video-assisted lobectomy, group B consisted of 280 patients who received thoracoscopic lobectomy, and group C consisted of 54 patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic lobectomy. The general data were similar among the 3 groups. The operative time was longer in group A (180.4±43.5min) than in groups B and C (153.2±28.6, 162.5±32.3min, P<0.05), but it was similar between groups B and C. There was no significant differences in blood loss, incidence of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, chest tube removal time, postoperative discharge time, lymph node dissection result among 3 groups. Conclusions Three types of thoracoscopic lobectomy showed similar results. The option of the method depends on degree of operative difficulty and surgeon's proficiency in performing the operation. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2013.11.010

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the method and result of thoracoscope-assisted lobectomy, thoracoscopic lobectomy and single-port laparoscopic lobectomy, and provide a reference for choice of surgical method. Methods Clinic data of 374 patients undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy from May 2007 to May 2012 in General Hospital of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Results Three hundred and seventy-four patients were classified into 3 groups according to different surgical method. Group A included 40 patients who underwent video-assisted lobectomy, group B consisted of 280 patients who received thoracoscopic lobectomy, and group C consisted of 54 patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic lobectomy. The general data were similar among the 3 groups. The operative time was longer in group A (180.4±43.5min) than in groups B and C (153.2±28.6, 162.5±32.3min, P<0.05), but it was similar between groups B and C. There was no significant differences in blood loss, incidence of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, chest tube removal time, postoperative discharge time, lymph node dissection result among 3 groups. Conclusions Three types of thoracoscopic lobectomy showed similar results. The option of the method depends on degree of operative difficulty and surgeon's proficiency in performing the operation. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2013.11.010

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the method and result of thoracoscope-assisted lobectomy, thoracoscopic lobectomy and single-port laparoscopic lobectomy, and provide a reference for choice of surgical method. Methods Clinic data of 374 patients undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy from May 2007 to May 2012 in General Hospital of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Results Three hundred and seventy-four patients were classified into 3 groups according to different surgical method. Group A included 40 patients who underwent video-assisted lobectomy, group B consisted of 280 patients who received thoracoscopic lobectomy, and group C consisted of 54 patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic lobectomy. The general data were similar among the 3 groups. The operative time was longer in group A (180.4±43.5min) than in groups B and C (153.2±28.6, 162.5±32.3min, P<0.05), but it was similar between groups B and C. There was no significant differences in blood loss, incidence of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, chest tube removal time, postoperative discharge time, lymph node dissection result among 3 groups. Conclusions Three types of thoracoscopic lobectomy showed similar results. The option of the method depends on degree of operative difficulty and surgeon's proficiency in performing the operation. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2013.11.010

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Dissection (medical), Thoracoscope, Blood loss, VATS lobectomy, Thoracotomy, Chest tube

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of method and result of three types of thoracoscopic lobectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens