1997•Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and TherapeuticsRequires access

Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin: a 6‐year follow‐up audit

Rusli Ismail, Adnan Haq, Muhd Faiz Azman, Ab Fatah Ab Rahman

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 1984 a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service was established in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and gentamicin concentrations were measured and used to design optimal regimens for the antibiotic. In this study we report on a 6-year follow-up audit since our first assessment of the service. METHOD: Records of 733 requests for gentamicin monitoring were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients involved, 39% were neonates and 42% were adults. Peak gentamicin concentrations were within the therapeutic range in 65% of the patients at first monitoring and 79% of the corresponding trough concentrations were within the non-toxic range. After dosage adjustment, 81% of the peak concentrations were within the therapeutic range and trough concentrations rose to levels regarded as toxic in 7% of patients. In patients with therapeutic peak concentrations at the first monitoring point, the average duration of gentamicin therapy was statistically shorter than in those patients who failed to achieve a therapeutic peak concentration. The distribution of gentamicin peak and trough concentrations in terms of therapeutic ranges were also better than those found in 1990. CONCLUSION: TDM for gentamicin is well accepted in HUSM and its application has contributed to improved gentamicin administration. Furthermore, our physicians are now able to choose more appropriate dosage regimens for their patients because the majority of gentamicin concentrations attained even at the first monitoring were within the therapeutic range.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 1984 a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service was established in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and gentamicin concentrations were measured and used to design optimal regimens for the antibiotic. In this study we report on a 6-year follow-up audit since our first assessment of the service. METHOD: Records of 733 requests for gentamicin monitoring were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients involved, 39% were neonates and 42% were adults. Peak gentamicin concentrations were within the therapeutic range in 65% of the patients at first monitoring and 79% of the corresponding trough concentrations were within the non-toxic range. After dosage adjustment, 81% of the peak concentrations were within the therapeutic range and trough concentrations rose to levels regarded as toxic in 7% of patients. In patients with therapeutic peak concentrations at the first monitoring point, the average duration of gentamicin therapy was statistically shorter than in those patients who failed to achieve a therapeutic peak concentration. The distribution of gentamicin peak and trough concentrations in terms of therapeutic ranges were also better than those found in 1990. CONCLUSION: TDM for gentamicin is well accepted in HUSM and its application has contributed to improved gentamicin administration. Furthermore, our physicians are now able to choose more appropriate dosage regimens for their patients because the majority of gentamicin concentrations attained even at the first monitoring were within the therapeutic range.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 1984 a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service was established in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and gentamicin concentrations were measured and used to design optimal regimens for the antibiotic. In this study we report on a 6-year follow-up audit since our first assessment of the service. METHOD: Records of 733 requests for gentamicin monitoring were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients involved, 39% were neonates and 42% were adults. Peak gentamicin concentrations were within the therapeutic range in 65% of the patients at first monitoring and 79% of the corresponding trough concentrations were within the non-toxic range. After dosage adjustment, 81% of the peak concentrations were within the therapeutic range and trough concentrations rose to levels regarded as toxic in 7% of patients. In patients with therapeutic peak concentrations at the first monitoring point, the average duration of gentamicin therapy was statistically shorter than in those patients who failed to achieve a therapeutic peak concentration. The distribution of gentamicin peak and trough concentrations in terms of therapeutic ranges were also better than those found in 1990. CONCLUSION: TDM for gentamicin is well accepted in HUSM and its application has contributed to improved gentamicin administration. Furthermore, our physicians are now able to choose more appropriate dosage regimens for their patients because the majority of gentamicin concentrations attained even at the first monitoring were within the therapeutic range.

Key concepts: Gentamicin, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Medicine, Therapeutic index, Trough level, Antibiotics, Therapeutic effect, Aminoglycoside

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin: a 6‐year follow‐up audit — Research Paper | ScholarLens