1981Australian Journal of Agricultural ResearchRequires access

Sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat. I. Concentrations of sulfur and nitrogen and the nitrogen to sulfur ratio in grain, in relation to the yield response

PJ Randall, Kate Spencer, J. R. Freney

Open publisher page 128 citations

Abstract

Grain samples from a factorial (5 sulfur x 3 nitrogen treatments) field experiment with Olympic wheat, which showed yield responses to both factors, were analysed for total sulfur and nitrogen. Sulfur application increased the grain sulfur concentration more with high than with low nitrogen treatment, but had only small effects on the nitrogen concentration in grain. Nitrogen application increased the grain sulfur concentration at high but not low sulfur and increased grain nitrogen concentration at all sulfur treatment levels. The critical grain sulfur value for yield was 0.12% in treatments adequately supplied with nitrogen, but plots with low nitrogen (sulfur-unresponsive) also had grain sulfur values below 0.12 %. Grain from sulfur-responsive plants could be distinguished from grain from unresponsive plants because the former had less than 0.12% sulfur and nitrogen/sulfur ratios wider than 17/1. Results from a glasshouse experiment with three cultivars were consistent with this. The findings suggest that seed analysis may be a useful method for diagnosis of the sulfur status of cereal crops.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Grain samples from a factorial (5 sulfur x 3 nitrogen treatments) field experiment with Olympic wheat, which showed yield responses to both factors, were analysed for total sulfur and nitrogen. Sulfur application increased the grain sulfur concentration more with high than with low nitrogen treatment, but had only small effects on the nitrogen concentration in grain. Nitrogen application increased the grain sulfur concentration at high but not low sulfur and increased grain nitrogen concentration at all sulfur treatment levels. The critical grain sulfur value for yield was 0.12% in treatments adequately supplied with nitrogen, but plots with low nitrogen (sulfur-unresponsive) also had grain sulfur values below 0.12 %. Grain from sulfur-responsive plants could be distinguished from grain from unresponsive plants because the former had less than 0.12% sulfur and nitrogen/sulfur ratios wider than 17/1. Results from a glasshouse experiment with three cultivars were consistent with this. The findings suggest that seed analysis may be a useful method for diagnosis of the sulfur status of cereal crops.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 128 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Grain samples from a factorial (5 sulfur x 3 nitrogen treatments) field experiment with Olympic wheat, which showed yield responses to both factors, were analysed for total sulfur and nitrogen. Sulfur application increased the grain sulfur concentration more with high than with low nitrogen treatment, but had only small effects on the nitrogen concentration in grain. Nitrogen application increased the grain sulfur concentration at high but not low sulfur and increased grain nitrogen concentration at all sulfur treatment levels. The critical grain sulfur value for yield was 0.12% in treatments adequately supplied with nitrogen, but plots with low nitrogen (sulfur-unresponsive) also had grain sulfur values below 0.12 %. Grain from sulfur-responsive plants could be distinguished from grain from unresponsive plants because the former had less than 0.12% sulfur and nitrogen/sulfur ratios wider than 17/1. Results from a glasshouse experiment with three cultivars were consistent with this. The findings suggest that seed analysis may be a useful method for diagnosis of the sulfur status of cereal crops.

Key concepts: Sulfur, Nitrogen, Chemistry, Agronomy, Yield (engineering), Metallurgy, Materials science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat. I. Concentrations of sulfur and nitrogen and the nitrogen to sulfur ratio in grain, in relation to the yield response — Research Paper | ScholarLens