2005Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyRequires access

Microstructural Development on Firing Illite and Smectite Clays Compared with that in Kaolinite

Caspar J. McConville, William Lee

Open publisher page 145 citations

Abstract

Thermal transformation of illite and smectite group clay minerals was studied using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, and the results were compared with those of kaolinite. Differences were observed in the types and sizes of crystals formed at temperatures between 800° and 1400°C. Spinel‐type phases were formed after 3 h at 1000°C in all three clays, but the morphology and composition of the spinel crystals varied. Mullite crystals reached greater sizes in the illite (>10 μm needles) and smectite (>1 μm) materials than in the kaolinite (0.5 μm). Iron‐rich crystals formed in the illite and smectite materials, and feldspars present as impurities in these clays, along with interlayer cations, resulted in large quantities of liquid being formed above 1000°C. Similar thermal breakdown and phase development schemes are proposed for all three materials, with the major differences observed ascribed to the presence or absence of interlayer cations, substitutional impurities, and accessory minerals. These results provide a basis for predicting phase development on firing a given clay mineral, if its characteristics and impurity levels are known.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thermal transformation of illite and smectite group clay minerals was studied using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, and the results were compared with those of kaolinite. Differences were observed in the types and sizes of crystals formed at temperatures between 800° and 1400°C. Spinel‐type phases were formed after 3 h at 1000°C in all three clays, but the morphology and composition of the spinel crystals varied. Mullite crystals reached greater sizes in the illite (>10 μm needles) and smectite (>1 μm) materials than in the kaolinite (0.5 μm). Iron‐rich crystals formed in the illite and smectite materials, and feldspars present as impurities in these clays, along with interlayer cations, resulted in large quantities of liquid being formed above 1000°C. Similar thermal breakdown and phase development schemes are proposed for all three materials, with the major differences observed ascribed to the presence or absence of interlayer cations, substitutional impurities, and accessory minerals. These results provide a basis for predicting phase development on firing a given clay mineral, if its characteristics and impurity levels are known.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 145 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thermal transformation of illite and smectite group clay minerals was studied using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, and the results were compared with those of kaolinite. Differences were observed in the types and sizes of crystals formed at temperatures between 800° and 1400°C. Spinel‐type phases were formed after 3 h at 1000°C in all three clays, but the morphology and composition of the spinel crystals varied. Mullite crystals reached greater sizes in the illite (>10 μm needles) and smectite (>1 μm) materials than in the kaolinite (0.5 μm). Iron‐rich crystals formed in the illite and smectite materials, and feldspars present as impurities in these clays, along with interlayer cations, resulted in large quantities of liquid being formed above 1000°C. Similar thermal breakdown and phase development schemes are proposed for all three materials, with the major differences observed ascribed to the presence or absence of interlayer cations, substitutional impurities, and accessory minerals. These results provide a basis for predicting phase development on firing a given clay mineral, if its characteristics and impurity levels are known.

Key concepts: Illite, Kaolinite, Clay minerals, Mullite, Spinel, Mineralogy, Impurity, Phase (matter)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microstructural Development on Firing Illite and Smectite Clays Compared with that in Kaolinite — Research Paper | ScholarLens