1954•Journal of HygieneOpen access

The combination of antitoxin with toxin and toxoid

Mollie Barr, A. T. Glenny, Muriel F. Stevens

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

1. Non-avid tetanus antitoxin appears to have a higher titre in relation to an avid standard if titrations are made against test toxins with a high toxoid content. The least avid serum tested appeared to be 2·87 times as potent when titrations were made against a toxin grown for 35 days than when a 2-day growth was used. Using the same test doses avid sera did not show this discrepancy. 2. A mixture of short-growth toxin and formol toxoid reacted similarly to the long-growth toxin. 3. Some non-avid tetanus antitoxic sera showed evidence of difference in goodness of fit with two test toxins; one serum was 2·49 times the titre of another when tested against one toxin and only 1·37 times when tested against another toxin. 4. Diphtheria toxoid has less affinity than toxin for antitoxin; this difference is greater with formol toxoids of poor immunizing efficiency; the difference is further accentuated if non-avid anti-toxin is used. 5. The Danysz effect may be very small if non-avid antitoxin is used. 6. In the presence of excess antitoxin, toxin or formol toxoid can combine with 3, 4 or more times its equivalent as judged byin vivotitrations for free antitoxin. 7. The serum ratio, i.e.in vivotitre/in vitrotitre of high or low ratio antitoxin in multiple combinations is nearer unity than that of the original antitoxin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Non-avid tetanus antitoxin appears to have a higher titre in relation to an avid standard if titrations are made against test toxins with a high toxoid content. The least avid serum tested appeared to be 2·87 times as potent when titrations were made against a toxin grown for 35 days than when a 2-day growth was used. Using the same test doses avid sera did not show this discrepancy. 2. A mixture of short-growth toxin and formol toxoid reacted similarly to the long-growth toxin. 3. Some non-avid tetanus antitoxic sera showed evidence of difference in goodness of fit with two test toxins; one serum was 2·49 times the titre of another when tested against one toxin and only 1·37 times when tested against another toxin. 4. Diphtheria toxoid has less affinity than toxin for antitoxin; this difference is greater with formol toxoids of poor immunizing efficiency; the difference is further accentuated if non-avid anti-toxin is used. 5. The Danysz effect may be very small if non-avid antitoxin is used. 6. In the presence of excess antitoxin, toxin or formol toxoid can combine with 3, 4 or more times its equivalent as judged byin vivotitrations for free antitoxin. 7. The serum ratio, i.e.in vivotitre/in vitrotitre of high or low ratio antitoxin in multiple combinations is nearer unity than that of the original antitoxin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Non-avid tetanus antitoxin appears to have a higher titre in relation to an avid standard if titrations are made against test toxins with a high toxoid content. The least avid serum tested appeared to be 2·87 times as potent when titrations were made against a toxin grown for 35 days than when a 2-day growth was used. Using the same test doses avid sera did not show this discrepancy. 2. A mixture of short-growth toxin and formol toxoid reacted similarly to the long-growth toxin. 3. Some non-avid tetanus antitoxic sera showed evidence of difference in goodness of fit with two test toxins; one serum was 2·49 times the titre of another when tested against one toxin and only 1·37 times when tested against another toxin. 4. Diphtheria toxoid has less affinity than toxin for antitoxin; this difference is greater with formol toxoids of poor immunizing efficiency; the difference is further accentuated if non-avid anti-toxin is used. 5. The Danysz effect may be very small if non-avid antitoxin is used. 6. In the presence of excess antitoxin, toxin or formol toxoid can combine with 3, 4 or more times its equivalent as judged byin vivotitrations for free antitoxin. 7. The serum ratio, i.e.in vivotitre/in vitrotitre of high or low ratio antitoxin in multiple combinations is nearer unity than that of the original antitoxin.

Key concepts: Antitoxin, Toxoid, Toxin, Diphtheria toxin, Titer, Tetanus, Microbiology, Tetanus antitoxin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The combination of antitoxin with toxin and toxoid — Research Paper | ScholarLens