1988MeteoriticsRequires access

Igneous History of the Aubrite Parent Asteroid: Evidence from the Norton County Enstatite Achondrite

Akihiko Okada, Klaus Keil, G. J. Taylor, H. E. Newsom

Open publisher page 110 citations

Abstract

Abstract— We studied numerous specimens of the Norton County enstatite achondrite (aubrite) by optical microscopy, electron microprobe, and neutron‐activation analysis. Our main conclusions are the following: 1. Norton County is a fragmental impact breccia, consisting of a clastic matrix made mostly of crushed enstatite, into which are embedded a variety of mineral and lithic clasts of both igneous and impact melt origin. 2. The Norton County precursor materials were igneous rocks, mostly plutonic orthopyroxenites, not grains formed by condensation from the solar nebula. 3. The Mg‐silicate‐rich aubrite parent body experienced extensive melting and igneous differentiation, causing formation of diverse lithologies, some of which have not been described previously. These lithologies include dunites (represented by forsterite crystals), plutonic orthopyroxenites (represented by most enstatite crystals in the matrix), plutonic pyroxenites (the pyroxenitic clasts), and plagioclase‐silica rocks (like the feldspathic clasts). Presence of impact melt breccias (the microporphyritic clasts and the diopside‐plagioclase‐silica clast) of still different compositions further attest to the lithologic diversity of the aubrite parent body.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract— We studied numerous specimens of the Norton County enstatite achondrite (aubrite) by optical microscopy, electron microprobe, and neutron‐activation analysis. Our main conclusions are the following: 1. Norton County is a fragmental impact breccia, consisting of a clastic matrix made mostly of crushed enstatite, into which are embedded a variety of mineral and lithic clasts of both igneous and impact melt origin. 2. The Norton County precursor materials were igneous rocks, mostly plutonic orthopyroxenites, not grains formed by condensation from the solar nebula. 3. The Mg‐silicate‐rich aubrite parent body experienced extensive melting and igneous differentiation, causing formation of diverse lithologies, some of which have not been described previously. These lithologies include dunites (represented by forsterite crystals), plutonic orthopyroxenites (represented by most enstatite crystals in the matrix), plutonic pyroxenites (the pyroxenitic clasts), and plagioclase‐silica rocks (like the feldspathic clasts). Presence of impact melt breccias (the microporphyritic clasts and the diopside‐plagioclase‐silica clast) of still different compositions further attest to the lithologic diversity of the aubrite parent body.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 110 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract— We studied numerous specimens of the Norton County enstatite achondrite (aubrite) by optical microscopy, electron microprobe, and neutron‐activation analysis. Our main conclusions are the following: 1. Norton County is a fragmental impact breccia, consisting of a clastic matrix made mostly of crushed enstatite, into which are embedded a variety of mineral and lithic clasts of both igneous and impact melt origin. 2. The Norton County precursor materials were igneous rocks, mostly plutonic orthopyroxenites, not grains formed by condensation from the solar nebula. 3. The Mg‐silicate‐rich aubrite parent body experienced extensive melting and igneous differentiation, causing formation of diverse lithologies, some of which have not been described previously. These lithologies include dunites (represented by forsterite crystals), plutonic orthopyroxenites (represented by most enstatite crystals in the matrix), plutonic pyroxenites (the pyroxenitic clasts), and plagioclase‐silica rocks (like the feldspathic clasts). Presence of impact melt breccias (the microporphyritic clasts and the diopside‐plagioclase‐silica clast) of still different compositions further attest to the lithologic diversity of the aubrite parent body.

Key concepts: Achondrite, Geology, Geochemistry, Breccia, Igneous rock, Clastic rock, Enstatite, Parent body

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Igneous History of the Aubrite Parent Asteroid: Evidence from the Norton County Enstatite Achondrite — Research Paper | ScholarLens