Influence of Slow-rate Freezing and Vitrification on Mouse Embryos
R Hredzák, A Ostró, I Maraček, V. Ždilová J. Kačmárik, Jarmila Veselá
Abstract
Open-access reader
R Hredzák, A Ostró, I Maraček, V. Ždilová J. Kačmárik, Jarmila Veselá
Abstract
Open-access reader
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of two different methods of embryo freezing (slow-rate freezing employing programmable freezing equipment and ultra-rapid freezing by vitrification) on developmental capacity of two-cell mouse embryos on the basis of their development to blastocyst stage and implantation rate of blastocysts.Two-cell embryos were obtained from superovulated female mice and divided to three groups.The first group of embryos was frozen by the slow controlled-rate method using a programmable freezing equipment with propanediol as a cryoprotectant.Embryos from the second group were vitrified employing ethylene glycol as a cryoprotectant.The third group of embryos was cultivated in vitro without cryopreservation in a cultivation medium in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO 2 .After thawing, the embryos from the first two groups were cultivated in vitro under conditions identical to those used for fresh embryos.The blastocysts that developed in vitro from embryos of all three groups were transferred to uteri of pseudo-gravid female mice to determine their implantation capacity.The percentage of vitrified embryos that developed into blastocysts was significantly lower than that of the fresh and slow-rate frozen embryos.The morphological appearance of embryos from all three groups was the same.The implantation rate of blastocysts that developed from vitrified embryos was significantly lower compared to the fresh and slow-rate frozen embryos.The results obtained indicate that freezing of embryos affects negatively their further development the negative effect of vitrification being more detrimental.As a "universal" vitrification protocol has not yet been defined, additional studies are needed to achieve its optimisation.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of two different methods of embryo freezing (slow-rate freezing employing programmable freezing equipment and ultra-rapid freezing by vitrification) on developmental capacity of two-cell mouse embryos on the basis of their development to blastocyst stage and implantation rate of blastocysts.Two-cell embryos were obtained from superovulated female mice and divided to three groups.The first group of embryos was frozen by the slow controlled-rate method using a programmable freezing equipment with propanediol as a cryoprotectant.Embryos from the second group were vitrified employing ethylene glycol as a cryoprotectant.The third group of embryos was cultivated in vitro without cryopreservation in a cultivation medium in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO 2 .After thawing, the embryos from the first two groups were cultivated in vitro under conditions identical to those used for fresh embryos.The blastocysts that developed in vitro from embryos of all three groups were transferred to uteri of pseudo-gravid female mice to determine their implantation capacity.The percentage of vitrified embryos that developed into blastocysts was significantly lower than that of the fresh and slow-rate frozen embryos.The morphological appearance of embryos from all three groups was the same.The implantation rate of blastocysts that developed from vitrified embryos was significantly lower compared to the fresh and slow-rate frozen embryos.The results obtained indicate that freezing of embryos affects negatively their further development the negative effect of vitrification being more detrimental.As a "universal" vitrification protocol has not yet been defined, additional studies are needed to achieve its optimisation.
Key concepts: Vitrification, Andrology, Embryo, Cryopreservation, Biology, Animal science, Cell biology, Medicine