Fire conditions for smoke toxicity measurement
Richard G. Gann, Vytenis Babrauskas, Richard D. Peacock, John R. Hall
Abstract
Richard G. Gann, Vytenis Babrauskas, Richard D. Peacock, John R. Hall
Abstract
Abstract This paper identifies those fire conditions most often present when smoke toxicity is the cause of death. It begins with a review of the evidence that smoke‐inhalation deaths are in the majority in fire fatalities in the United States. Next, there is an analysis of the evidence from the national fire experience showing the connection between post‐flashover fires and smoke‐inhalation deaths. Third is a presentation of real‐scale fire test results demonstrating that post‐flashover conditions are necessary to produce enough smoke to cause smoke‐inhalation deaths in the cases where they actually occur. The fourth component is a sampling of results from computer simulations of fires, affirming and broadening the results from the fire tests. It is concluded that smoke‐inhalation deaths occur predominantly after fires have progressed beyond flashover. This conclusion then provides a focus for smoke toxicity measurement in particular and fire hazard mitigation in general.
OpenAlex reports 116 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This paper identifies those fire conditions most often present when smoke toxicity is the cause of death. It begins with a review of the evidence that smoke‐inhalation deaths are in the majority in fire fatalities in the United States. Next, there is an analysis of the evidence from the national fire experience showing the connection between post‐flashover fires and smoke‐inhalation deaths. Third is a presentation of real‐scale fire test results demonstrating that post‐flashover conditions are necessary to produce enough smoke to cause smoke‐inhalation deaths in the cases where they actually occur. The fourth component is a sampling of results from computer simulations of fires, affirming and broadening the results from the fire tests. It is concluded that smoke‐inhalation deaths occur predominantly after fires have progressed beyond flashover. This conclusion then provides a focus for smoke toxicity measurement in particular and fire hazard mitigation in general.
Key concepts: Smoke, Smoke inhalation, Fire hazard, Forensic engineering, Arc flash, Poison control, Environmental science, Hazard