2011The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health CareRequires access

Acceptability of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system and etonogestrel implant: One-year results of an observational study

Mary B. Short, Dominique Dallay, Salmon Omokanye, Jens Ulrich Hanisch, Pirjo Inki

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the acceptability and patterns of use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the etonogestrel releasing-subdermal implant (ENG implant) among young European women. METHODS: A total of 454 women aged 20-35 years opting to switch their method of contraception from oral contraception to the LNG-IUS or ENG implant, were recruited in an observational study in four different European countries (France, Ireland, Slovakia and the United Kingdom). The present paper reports the interim results of the study at 12 months of observation. RESULTS: Data from 311 subjects (211 using the LNG-IUS and 100 using the ENG implant), with at least one follow-up visit after insertion, were analysed. The cumulative continuation rates at 12 months for the LNG-IUS and ENG implant were 93% and 86%, respectively. Most women were satisfied with their method of contraception after one year of follow-up (80% in the LNG-IUS group and 66% in the ENG implant group). CONCLUSIONS: Both the LNG-IUS and the ENG implant are highly acceptable contraceptive options among women with previous experience of oral contraceptive use. The highest continuation and satisfaction rates were observed with the LNG-IUS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the acceptability and patterns of use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the etonogestrel releasing-subdermal implant (ENG implant) among young European women. METHODS: A total of 454 women aged 20-35 years opting to switch their method of contraception from oral contraception to the LNG-IUS or ENG implant, were recruited in an observational study in four different European countries (France, Ireland, Slovakia and the United Kingdom). The present paper reports the interim results of the study at 12 months of observation. RESULTS: Data from 311 subjects (211 using the LNG-IUS and 100 using the ENG implant), with at least one follow-up visit after insertion, were analysed. The cumulative continuation rates at 12 months for the LNG-IUS and ENG implant were 93% and 86%, respectively. Most women were satisfied with their method of contraception after one year of follow-up (80% in the LNG-IUS group and 66% in the ENG implant group). CONCLUSIONS: Both the LNG-IUS and the ENG implant are highly acceptable contraceptive options among women with previous experience of oral contraceptive use. The highest continuation and satisfaction rates were observed with the LNG-IUS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the acceptability and patterns of use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the etonogestrel releasing-subdermal implant (ENG implant) among young European women. METHODS: A total of 454 women aged 20-35 years opting to switch their method of contraception from oral contraception to the LNG-IUS or ENG implant, were recruited in an observational study in four different European countries (France, Ireland, Slovakia and the United Kingdom). The present paper reports the interim results of the study at 12 months of observation. RESULTS: Data from 311 subjects (211 using the LNG-IUS and 100 using the ENG implant), with at least one follow-up visit after insertion, were analysed. The cumulative continuation rates at 12 months for the LNG-IUS and ENG implant were 93% and 86%, respectively. Most women were satisfied with their method of contraception after one year of follow-up (80% in the LNG-IUS group and 66% in the ENG implant group). CONCLUSIONS: Both the LNG-IUS and the ENG implant are highly acceptable contraceptive options among women with previous experience of oral contraceptive use. The highest continuation and satisfaction rates were observed with the LNG-IUS.

Key concepts: Etonogestrel, Medicine, Levonorgestrel, Contraceptive implant, Implant, Observational study, Gynecology, Desogestrel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acceptability of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system and etonogestrel implant: One-year results of an observational study — Research Paper | ScholarLens