2008IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsRequires access

Comparison of the Frequency Compensation Techniques for CMOS Two-Stage Miller OTAs

Alfio Dario Grasso, G. Palumbo, Salvatore Pennisi

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Several design options are nowadays available for the frequency compensation of CMOS two-stage transconductance operational amplifiers, from the traditional Miller approach employing a nulling resistor or a voltage buffer, to a current buffer or the more modern current amplifier. However, designers have no results on the frequency performance achievable that allow to consciously choose the best approach to meet the prescribed specifications efficiently. In this paper, a comparison among the possible Miller approaches is carried out by exploiting an analytical figure of merit that expresses a tradeoff between gain-bandwidth product, load capacitance, and total transconductance for a given value of phase margin. Interesting and useful results, even unexpected, are found. The accuracy of the comparison is also validated through simulations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several design options are nowadays available for the frequency compensation of CMOS two-stage transconductance operational amplifiers, from the traditional Miller approach employing a nulling resistor or a voltage buffer, to a current buffer or the more modern current amplifier. However, designers have no results on the frequency performance achievable that allow to consciously choose the best approach to meet the prescribed specifications efficiently. In this paper, a comparison among the possible Miller approaches is carried out by exploiting an analytical figure of merit that expresses a tradeoff between gain-bandwidth product, load capacitance, and total transconductance for a given value of phase margin. Interesting and useful results, even unexpected, are found. The accuracy of the comparison is also validated through simulations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several design options are nowadays available for the frequency compensation of CMOS two-stage transconductance operational amplifiers, from the traditional Miller approach employing a nulling resistor or a voltage buffer, to a current buffer or the more modern current amplifier. However, designers have no results on the frequency performance achievable that allow to consciously choose the best approach to meet the prescribed specifications efficiently. In this paper, a comparison among the possible Miller approaches is carried out by exploiting an analytical figure of merit that expresses a tradeoff between gain-bandwidth product, load capacitance, and total transconductance for a given value of phase margin. Interesting and useful results, even unexpected, are found. The accuracy of the comparison is also validated through simulations.

Key concepts: Frequency compensation, Transconductance, Phase margin, Operational transconductance amplifier, Electronic engineering, CMOS, Electrical engineering, Resistor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Frequency Compensation Techniques for CMOS Two-Stage Miller OTAs — Research Paper | ScholarLens