1989Basic and Applied Social PsychologyRequires access

Employee-Influence Strategies as Possible Stress-Coping Mechanisms for Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity

Ronald J. Deluga

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the coping mechanisms associated with role conflict and ambiguity. One hundred twenty-four salaried employees of a metal fabricating firm completed Form-M of the Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies Scale (POIS-M; Kipnis & Schmidt, 1982) and the Role Conflict and Ambiguity Scales (House & Rizzo, 1972b). Pearson product-moment correlations were used to analyze the relationship between the influence strategies and role measures. The results appeared to support the hypothesis that rising levels of role conflict would be significantly related to frequent use of strategies by employees to influence their managers (role senders). No such relationship was found with role ambiguity. The findings are discussed in terms of how employees can engage in influencing behavior to cope with role conflict.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to examine the coping mechanisms associated with role conflict and ambiguity. One hundred twenty-four salaried employees of a metal fabricating firm completed Form-M of the Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies Scale (POIS-M; Kipnis & Schmidt, 1982) and the Role Conflict and Ambiguity Scales (House & Rizzo, 1972b). Pearson product-moment correlations were used to analyze the relationship between the influence strategies and role measures. The results appeared to support the hypothesis that rising levels of role conflict would be significantly related to frequent use of strategies by employees to influence their managers (role senders). No such relationship was found with role ambiguity. The findings are discussed in terms of how employees can engage in influencing behavior to cope with role conflict.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the coping mechanisms associated with role conflict and ambiguity. One hundred twenty-four salaried employees of a metal fabricating firm completed Form-M of the Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies Scale (POIS-M; Kipnis & Schmidt, 1982) and the Role Conflict and Ambiguity Scales (House & Rizzo, 1972b). Pearson product-moment correlations were used to analyze the relationship between the influence strategies and role measures. The results appeared to support the hypothesis that rising levels of role conflict would be significantly related to frequent use of strategies by employees to influence their managers (role senders). No such relationship was found with role ambiguity. The findings are discussed in terms of how employees can engage in influencing behavior to cope with role conflict.

Key concepts: Ambiguity, Role conflict, Psychology, Social psychology, Coping (psychology), Clinical psychology, Philosophy, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Employee-Influence Strategies as Possible Stress-Coping Mechanisms for Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity — Research Paper | ScholarLens