2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Government Deficit and Substitutability between Debt Instruments

Dongkyu Park

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper provides theoretical and empirical analysis for the issue of crowding out when a distinction is noted between bonds and loans as debt instrument. It turns out that there exists additional crowding out with the introduction of loans, which are not perfect substitutes of bonds. It is shown that the differential impact on asset returns of the fiscal policy depends upon the degree of substitutability between the financial assets. Namely, the higher the degree of substitutability between money and bonds is and the lower the degree of substitutability between loans and bonds is, the greater the level of crowding out is.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper provides theoretical and empirical analysis for the issue of crowding out when a distinction is noted between bonds and loans as debt instrument. It turns out that there exists additional crowding out with the introduction of loans, which are not perfect substitutes of bonds. It is shown that the differential impact on asset returns of the fiscal policy depends upon the degree of substitutability between the financial assets. Namely, the higher the degree of substitutability between money and bonds is and the lower the degree of substitutability between loans and bonds is, the greater the level of crowding out is.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper provides theoretical and empirical analysis for the issue of crowding out when a distinction is noted between bonds and loans as debt instrument. It turns out that there exists additional crowding out with the introduction of loans, which are not perfect substitutes of bonds. It is shown that the differential impact on asset returns of the fiscal policy depends upon the degree of substitutability between the financial assets. Namely, the higher the degree of substitutability between money and bonds is and the lower the degree of substitutability between loans and bonds is, the greater the level of crowding out is.

Key concepts: Crowding out, Economics, Bond, Debt, Monetary economics, Asset (computer security), Government debt, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Government Deficit and Substitutability between Debt Instruments — Research Paper | ScholarLens