2006•Journal of Planning Education and ResearchRequires access

New Urbanism and Sprawl

Andrejs Skaburskis

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

This article presents an approach that has not been previously used for assessing claims regarding a development's impact on urban form and sprawl. The analysis shows that the Cornell new urbanist development increases suburban densities but not by nearly as much as would be inferred by analysis that simply compares the density of the development with that of the surrounding conventional suburbs. Most households living in the higher-density building types plan to eventually move to detached houses. If new urbanism, as it is expressed in the planning and design of Cornell, is to be a generalizable substitute to conventional suburban development, its projects will have to have a much larger proportion of single-family detached houses than the Cornell's 37 percent. New urbanists may best help reduce city spread by inducing households to move to and then to stay in single-family detached houses on smaller lots.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article presents an approach that has not been previously used for assessing claims regarding a development's impact on urban form and sprawl. The analysis shows that the Cornell new urbanist development increases suburban densities but not by nearly as much as would be inferred by analysis that simply compares the density of the development with that of the surrounding conventional suburbs. Most households living in the higher-density building types plan to eventually move to detached houses. If new urbanism, as it is expressed in the planning and design of Cornell, is to be a generalizable substitute to conventional suburban development, its projects will have to have a much larger proportion of single-family detached houses than the Cornell's 37 percent. New urbanists may best help reduce city spread by inducing households to move to and then to stay in single-family detached houses on smaller lots.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article presents an approach that has not been previously used for assessing claims regarding a development's impact on urban form and sprawl. The analysis shows that the Cornell new urbanist development increases suburban densities but not by nearly as much as would be inferred by analysis that simply compares the density of the development with that of the surrounding conventional suburbs. Most households living in the higher-density building types plan to eventually move to detached houses. If new urbanism, as it is expressed in the planning and design of Cornell, is to be a generalizable substitute to conventional suburban development, its projects will have to have a much larger proportion of single-family detached houses than the Cornell's 37 percent. New urbanists may best help reduce city spread by inducing households to move to and then to stay in single-family detached houses on smaller lots.

Key concepts: Urban sprawl, Urbanism, New Urbanism, Plan (archaeology), Single-family detached home, Urban planning, Geography, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Urbanism and Sprawl — Research Paper | ScholarLens