2006Latin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas)Open access

What Gives Musical Theatre Musical Integrity? An Analysis of the Opening Scene of South Pacific

Edward Green

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Perhaps no term is more associated with the work of Rodgers and Hammerstein than "the integrated musical."It has often been stated that with Oklahoma!(1943) a new integrity came to the art of Broadway: a true coordination of all its constituent elements.1 Many historians would disagree, arguing that such a musical existed as early as 1927 with Showboat.Others would say Rodgers himself had already approached this ideal by 1940 with Pal Joey.However this all may be, there remains a surprising, even shocking, gap in the way most scholars have approached the issue of "integrity" in the "integrated" musical.For if musical theatre is to make a unity of all its elements, musical and extra-musical, would it not make sense to ask on what basis it might achieve musical integrity?Rodgers, as early as 1939-several years before the "breakthrough" of Oklahoma!-was already insistent that his scores be seen as more than mere tuneful medleys, more than collections of isolated hits.More, even, than a cunning selection of separate musical numbers artfully designed to fit ever-changing dramatic situations.While Irving Berlin-even as late as Annie Get Your Gun (1946)-remained largely content with the concept of a show as a collection of effective independent numbers, each of which, hopefully, might also achieve extratheatrical success as a pop hit, Rodgers saw musical theatre, and a composer's responsibility towards it, differently.2 In "How to Write Music in No Easy Lessons: A Self-Interview," which appeared in the October 1939 issue of Theatre Arts, he asserted: "I write scores and not isolated song numbers; therefore the particular song in question must bear a family resemblance to the other musical materials in the piece." 3 Among the few scholars who have taken Rodgers at his word and have inquired into his works in terms of their structural integrity and large-scale musical coherence is Geoffrey Block. 4 For example, he dedicates eight pages in his 2003 study, Richard Rodgers, to how "family resemblances" can be found among the seemingly very divergent melodies of South Pacific.5 In that book, he points out Edward Green is a professor at Manhattan School of Music, composer-in-residence for the Aesthetic Realism Theatre Company, and staff composer for Imagery Films.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Perhaps no term is more associated with the work of Rodgers and Hammerstein than "the integrated musical."It has often been stated that with Oklahoma!(1943) a new integrity came to the art of Broadway: a true coordination of all its constituent elements.1 Many historians would disagree, arguing that such a musical existed as early as 1927 with Showboat.Others would say Rodgers himself had already approached this ideal by 1940 with Pal Joey.However this all may be, there remains a surprising, even shocking, gap in the way most scholars have approached the issue of "integrity" in the "integrated" musical.For if musical theatre is to make a unity of all its elements, musical and extra-musical, would it not make sense to ask on what basis it might achieve musical integrity?Rodgers, as early as 1939-several years before the "breakthrough" of Oklahoma!-was already insistent that his scores be seen as more than mere tuneful medleys, more than collections of isolated hits.More, even, than a cunning selection of separate musical numbers artfully designed to fit ever-changing dramatic situations.While Irving Berlin-even as late as Annie Get Your Gun (1946)-remained largely content with the concept of a show as a collection of effective independent numbers, each of which, hopefully, might also achieve extratheatrical success as a pop hit, Rodgers saw musical theatre, and a composer's responsibility towards it, differently.2 In "How to Write Music in No Easy Lessons: A Self-Interview," which appeared in the October 1939 issue of Theatre Arts, he asserted: "I write scores and not isolated song numbers; therefore the particular song in question must bear a family resemblance to the other musical materials in the piece." 3 Among the few scholars who have taken Rodgers at his word and have inquired into his works in terms of their structural integrity and large-scale musical coherence is Geoffrey Block. 4 For example, he dedicates eight pages in his 2003 study, Richard Rodgers, to how "family resemblances" can be found among the seemingly very divergent melodies of South Pacific.5 In that book, he points out Edward Green is a professor at Manhattan School of Music, composer-in-residence for the Aesthetic Realism Theatre Company, and staff composer for Imagery Films.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Perhaps no term is more associated with the work of Rodgers and Hammerstein than "the integrated musical."It has often been stated that with Oklahoma!(1943) a new integrity came to the art of Broadway: a true coordination of all its constituent elements.1 Many historians would disagree, arguing that such a musical existed as early as 1927 with Showboat.Others would say Rodgers himself had already approached this ideal by 1940 with Pal Joey.However this all may be, there remains a surprising, even shocking, gap in the way most scholars have approached the issue of "integrity" in the "integrated" musical.For if musical theatre is to make a unity of all its elements, musical and extra-musical, would it not make sense to ask on what basis it might achieve musical integrity?Rodgers, as early as 1939-several years before the "breakthrough" of Oklahoma!-was already insistent that his scores be seen as more than mere tuneful medleys, more than collections of isolated hits.More, even, than a cunning selection of separate musical numbers artfully designed to fit ever-changing dramatic situations.While Irving Berlin-even as late as Annie Get Your Gun (1946)-remained largely content with the concept of a show as a collection of effective independent numbers, each of which, hopefully, might also achieve extratheatrical success as a pop hit, Rodgers saw musical theatre, and a composer's responsibility towards it, differently.2 In "How to Write Music in No Easy Lessons: A Self-Interview," which appeared in the October 1939 issue of Theatre Arts, he asserted: "I write scores and not isolated song numbers; therefore the particular song in question must bear a family resemblance to the other musical materials in the piece." 3 Among the few scholars who have taken Rodgers at his word and have inquired into his works in terms of their structural integrity and large-scale musical coherence is Geoffrey Block. 4 For example, he dedicates eight pages in his 2003 study, Richard Rodgers, to how "family resemblances" can be found among the seemingly very divergent melodies of South Pacific.5 In that book, he points out Edward Green is a professor at Manhattan School of Music, composer-in-residence for the Aesthetic Realism Theatre Company, and staff composer for Imagery Films.

Key concepts: Musical, Musical analysis, Art, Visual arts, Aesthetics, History, Literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Gives Musical Theatre Musical Integrity? An Analysis of the Opening Scene of South Pacific — Research Paper | ScholarLens